Suppr超能文献

生物制剂与 JAK 抑制剂。第一部分:癌症风险。一篇叙述性综述。

Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part I: Cancer Risk. A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Mansilla-Polo Miguel, Morgado-Carrasco Daniel

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Jun;14(6):1389-1442. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01166-4. Epub 2024 May 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have revolutionized the treatment of diverse dermatoses. However, there are concerns regarding their safety, especially the risk of cancer and opportunistic infections. Here, we discuss the risk of cancer associated with the BD and JAKi used in dermatology.

METHODS

A narrative review was carried out. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of cancer associated with BD or JAKi and published between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.

RESULTS

Multiple large studies have evaluated the association between BD, JAKi and cancer risk. However, there is a lack of prospective, comparative studies. Overall, patients undergoing BD and JAKi present a cutaneous cancer incidence similar to that in the general population. The drugs more strongly associated with non-skin cancer risk were anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs) agents and JAKi (especially tofacitinib and oral ruxolitinib). This risk appears to increase with age, the presence of other factors (such as chronic immunosuppression from previous drugs or other comorbidities), and specific diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and myelodysplastic syndrome. Conversely, BD such as interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may even reduce the risk of some visceral and hematological malignancies. In patients with dermatological conditions such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the risk of malignancies may be lower than in other subgroups, and probably comparable to the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of cancer in patients undergoing BD or JAKi is generally low. This incidence can be higher in elderly patients with RA or myelodysplastic syndrome, and in those undergoing prolonged therapy with tofacitinib or ruxolitinib (oral), or anti-TNF agents.

摘要

引言

生物药物(BD)和 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)彻底改变了多种皮肤病的治疗方式。然而,人们对其安全性存在担忧,尤其是癌症和机会性感染的风险。在此,我们讨论皮肤科使用的 BD 和 JAKi 相关的癌症风险。

方法

进行了一项叙述性综述。选取了 2010 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月期间发表的所有评估 BD 或 JAKi 相关癌症风险的相关文章。

结果

多项大型研究评估了 BD、JAKi 与癌症风险之间的关联。然而,缺乏前瞻性的比较研究。总体而言,接受 BD 和 JAKi 治疗的患者皮肤癌发病率与普通人群相似。与非皮肤癌风险关联更强的药物是抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗 TNFs)药物和 JAKi(尤其是托法替布和口服芦可替尼)。这种风险似乎随着年龄、其他因素(如先前药物引起的慢性免疫抑制或其他合并症)以及类风湿关节炎(RA)和骨髓增生异常综合征等特定疾病的存在而增加。相反,白细胞介素(IL)-17 和 IL-23 抑制剂等 BD 甚至可能降低某些内脏和血液系统恶性肿瘤的风险。在患有银屑病和特应性皮炎等皮肤病的患者中,恶性肿瘤的风险可能低于其他亚组,并且可能与普通人群相当。

结论

接受 BD 或 JAKi 治疗的患者癌症发病率通常较低。在患有 RA 或骨髓增生异常综合征的老年患者中,以及在接受托法替布或芦可替尼(口服)或抗 TNF 药物长期治疗的患者中,这种发病率可能更高。

相似文献

1
Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part I: Cancer Risk. A Narrative Review.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Jun;14(6):1389-1442. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01166-4. Epub 2024 May 19.
2
Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):1983-2038. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01203-2. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Safety of JAK and IL-6 inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter cohort study.
Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 2;14:1267749. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267749. eCollection 2023.
6
Development and validation of a multiplex HPLC-MS/MS assay for the monitoring of JAK inhibitors in patient plasma.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2023 Nov 15;1230:123917. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123917. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
7
A Review of Safety Outcomes from Clinical Trials of Baricitinib in Rheumatology, Dermatology and COVID-19.
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):4910-4960. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02281-4. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
8
Start RA treatment - Biologics or JAK-inhibitors?
Autoimmun Rev. 2024 Jan;23(1):103429. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103429. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
9
JAK inhibitors impair GM-CSF-mediated signaling in innate immune cells.
BMC Immunol. 2020 Jun 15;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12865-020-00365-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Treatment of Recalcitrant Eosinophilic Pustular Folliculitis with Dupilumab.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):622-627. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2873. eCollection 2025.
2
Safety of Alopecia Treatments in Patients with Breast Cancer and High-Risk Women: A Review.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00961-9.
3
Targeting Senescence: A Review of Senolytics and Senomorphics in Anti-Aging Interventions.
Biomolecules. 2025 Jun 13;15(6):860. doi: 10.3390/biom15060860.
4
Cytokine Networks in Lichen Sclerosus: A Roadmap for Diagnosis and Treatment?
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 1;26(9):4315. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094315.
5
Therapeutic Advancements in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 16;14(4):1312. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041312.
6
Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a disproportionality analysis using FAERS database from 2012 to 2022.
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;44(4):1467-1474. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07360-9. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Generalized pustular psoriasis: A nationwide population-based study using the National Health Data System in France.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Jun;38(6):1131-1139. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19901. Epub 2024 Feb 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验