Suppr超能文献

β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签化去除在初级保健中既安全又节省成本。

β-Lactam allergy delabeling is safe and saves costs in Primary Care.

机构信息

Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.

Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2024 Nov;56(11):102925. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102925. Epub 2024 May 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the β-lactam allergy delabeling was safe and cost-saving in Primary Care (PC) patients.

DESIGN

We have conducted a retrospective chart review of PC patients with β-lactam allergy label evaluated in our Allergy Unit between 2017 and 2022. SITE: Allergy Department. Hospital Virgen del Rocio (Sevilla).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 391 patients labeled for β-lactam allergy in PC were studied.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

(a) Outcome evaluation of a β-lactam allergy delabeling procedure. (b) A ratio between the total e-prescribed antibiotic cost and the number of treatment days (the experimental daily antibiotic cost or EDAC) before and after delabeling was analyzed in delabeled and truly allergic patients.

RESULTS

The results of skin testing were positive in 9.2% of the reported cases (36 of 391 patients). The reactions to oral provocation challenge (OPC) occurred in 2.14% of the patients who underwent negative skin testing to offending β-lactam (in 15 of 699 OPC). A total of 307 patients (78.5%) were delabeled; 70 (17.9%) had a β-lactam selective response and 14 (3.59%) reacted to both penicillin and cephalosporin. The EDAC before and after the procedure in delabeled patients was significantly lower (0.88 € vs 0.62 €, p<10), than that observed in truly allergic group (0.87 € vs. 0.76 €, p=not significant).

CONCLUSION

To delabel β-lactam allergy in Primary Care patients is safe in most patients, cost-saving in antibioticotherapy, and allows identify the main clinical β-lactam allergy phenotypes that benefit from this procedure.

摘要

目的

确定在初级保健(PC)患者中进行β-内酰胺类药物过敏去标签化是否安全和节省成本。

设计

我们对 2017 年至 2022 年期间在我们过敏科评估的 PC 中具有β-内酰胺类药物过敏标签的患者进行了回顾性图表审查。

地点

过敏科。Virgen del Rocio 医院(塞维利亚)。

参与者

共研究了 391 名在 PC 中被标记为β-内酰胺类药物过敏的患者。

主要测量

(a)β-内酰胺类药物过敏去标签程序的结果评估。(b)在去标签化前后,分析去标签化和真正过敏患者的总电子处方抗生素费用与治疗天数(实验性每日抗生素费用或 EDAC)之间的比值。

结果

报告病例中有 9.2%(36/391 例)的皮肤试验结果阳性。对β-内酰胺类药物进行阴性皮肤试验的患者中,有 2.14%(15/699 例)发生口服激发挑战(OPC)反应。共有 307 名患者(78.5%)被去标签化;70 名(17.9%)对β-内酰胺类药物有选择性反应,14 名(3.59%)对青霉素和头孢菌素均有反应。去标签化患者的 EDAC 在程序前后显著降低(0.88 欧元与 0.62 欧元,p<10),明显低于真正过敏组(0.87 欧元与 0.76 欧元,p=无统计学意义)。

结论

在大多数患者中,在 PC 患者中去标签β-内酰胺类药物过敏是安全的,可以节省抗生素治疗费用,并可以确定从该程序中受益的主要临床β-内酰胺类药物过敏表型。

相似文献

1
β-Lactam allergy delabeling is safe and saves costs in Primary Care.
Aten Primaria. 2024 Nov;56(11):102925. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102925. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Delabeling of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics in hospitalized patients: a prospective study evaluating cost savings.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1067-1075. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01737-7. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
3
Impact of Patient-Reported Penicillin Allergy on Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection Among Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Nov 1;65(11):1397-1404. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002190. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
4
Penicillin skin testing in hospitalized patients with β-lactam allergies: Effect on antibiotic selection and cost.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Jul;117(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
Comparing Skin and Serum Testing to Direct Challenge Outcomes in Children With β-Lactam Allergies.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Nov;12(11):3034-3043.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.08.023. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
6
β-Lactam allergy testing and delabeling-Experiences and lessons from Singapore.
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2020 Sep;8(3):371-379. doi: 10.1002/iid3.318. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
7
A Prospective Study of Costs Associated with the Evaluation of β-Lactam Allergy in Children.
J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;223:108-113.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Drug Allergy Delabeling Programs: Recent Strategies and Targeted Populations.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jun;62(3):484-504. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08913-x. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
A novel 2-step process for the management of inpatient beta-lactam allergy labels.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Apr;132(4):525-531.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.028. Epub 2023 Dec 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Delabeling, safety, and impact of β-lactam allergy testing: A systematic review.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2023 Aug 9;2(4):100160. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100160. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
The Primary Process and Key Concepts of Economic Evaluation in Healthcare.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Sep;55(5):415-423. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.195. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
BSACI guideline for the set-up of penicillin allergy de-labelling services by non-allergists working in a hospital setting.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2022 Oct;52(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1111/cea.14217. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Resensitization in suspected penicillin allergy.
Allergy. 2023 Jan;78(1):214-224. doi: 10.1111/all.15508. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Antibiotic Allergy De-Labeling: A Pathway against Antibiotic Resistance.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 3;11(8):1055. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081055.
7
Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy.
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001859.
10
Betalactam hypersensitivity: The importance of delabelling in primary care.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;87(12):4619-4624. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14879. Epub 2021 May 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验