Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Oct;52(10):1551-1564. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01213-w. Epub 2024 May 31.
Research on the link between peer victimization and callous-unemotional (CU) traits has primarily relied on cross-sectional designs and yielded equivocal findings. In light of the poor outcomes related to peer victimization and CU traits, it is important to determine whether this link is reciprocal in nature and to identify factors that may influence its strength. Accordingly, the current study investigated the bidirectional association between peer victimization and CU traits over a 6-month period, accounting for the moderating effects of parents (i.e., support and hostility) and teachers (i.e., support and conflict). Participants included 284 third- through fifth-grade students (ages 7-12; 51.8% boys; 51.1% Hispanic) and their homeroom teachers. Children provided ratings of peer victimization, parental hostility, and parent and teacher support. Teachers provided ratings of CU traits and student-teacher conflict. A series of cross-lagged panel models were estimated. Results revealed that, at higher levels of parental hostility, peer victimization predicted increases in CU traits over time; in contrast, peer victimization predicted decreases in CU traits at lower levels of parental hostility. Surprisingly, at higher levels of teacher conflict, peer victimization predicted decreases in CU traits over time. CU traits did not interact with parent or teacher variables to predict subsequent peer victimization. Moreover, parental hostility was positively associated with subsequent peer victimization, whereas teacher support predicted decreases in victimization over time. These findings build on previous research examining environmental influences on the expression of CU traits by highlighting peer victimization and parental hostility as potential risk factors.
同伴侵害与冷酷无情(CU)特质之间的关系研究主要依赖于横断面设计,得出的结果存在分歧。鉴于同伴侵害和 CU 特质相关的不良后果,确定这种联系是否具有相互性,并确定可能影响其强度的因素非常重要。因此,本研究在 6 个月的时间内调查了同伴侵害和 CU 特质之间的双向关联,同时考虑了父母(即支持和敌意)和教师(即支持和冲突)的调节作用。参与者包括 284 名三至五年级学生(年龄 7-12 岁;51.8%为男孩;51.1%为西班牙裔)及其班主任。孩子们对同伴侵害、父母敌意以及父母和教师的支持进行了评价。教师对 CU 特质和师生冲突进行了评价。估计了一系列交叉滞后面板模型。结果表明,在父母敌意较高的情况下,同伴侵害会随着时间的推移预测 CU 特质的增加;相反,在父母敌意较低的情况下,同伴侵害会预测 CU 特质的减少。令人惊讶的是,在教师冲突较高的情况下,同伴侵害会随着时间的推移预测 CU 特质的减少。CU 特质与父母或教师变量之间没有相互作用来预测随后的同伴侵害。此外,父母敌意与随后的同伴侵害呈正相关,而教师支持则预示着随着时间的推移,受害情况会减少。这些发现通过强调同伴侵害和父母敌意作为潜在的风险因素,进一步研究了环境因素对 CU 特质表达的影响。