Suppr超能文献

降低心血管疾病风险的血脂异常管理指南的方法学质量与临床建议:一项系统评价及通过AGREE II和AGREE REX工具进行的评估

Methodological quality and clinical recommendations of guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemias for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review and an appraisal through AGREE II and AGREE REX tools.

作者信息

Deffert Flávia, Vilela Ana Paula Oliveira, Cobre Alexandre de Fátima, Furlan Luiz Henrique Picolo, Tonin Fernanda Stumpf, Fernandez-Llimos Fernando, Pontarolo Roberto

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil.

Pharmaceutical Assistance Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2024 Oct 8;41(5):649-661. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae029.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are statements to assist practitioners and stakeholders in decisions about healthcare. Low methodological quality guidelines may prejudice decision-making and negatively affect clinical outcomes in non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases worsted by poor lipid management. We appraised the quality of CPGs on dyslipidemia management and synthesized the most updated pharmacological recommendations.

METHODS

A systematic review following international recommendations was performed. Searches to retrieve CPG on pharmacological treatments in adults with dyslipidaemia were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Trip databases. Eligible articles were assessed using AGREE II (methodological quality) and AGREE-REX (recommendation excellence) tools. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. The most updated guidelines (published after 2019) had their recommendations qualitatively synthesized in an exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 66 guidelines authored by professional societies (75%) and targeting clinicians as primary users were selected. The AGREE II domains Scope and Purpose (89%) and Clarity of Presentation (97%), and the AGREE-REX item Clinical Applicability (77.0%) obtained the highest values. Conversely, guidelines were methodologically poorly performed/documented (46%) and scarcely provided data on the implementability of practical recommendations (38%). Recommendations on pharmacological treatments are overall similar, with slight differences concerning the use of supplements and the availability of drugs.

CONCLUSION

High-quality dyslipidaemia CPG, especially outside North America and Europe, and strictly addressing evidence synthesis, appraisal, and recommendations are needed, especially to guide primary care decisions. CPG developers should consider stakeholders' values and preferences and adapt existing statements to individual populations and healthcare systems to ensure successful implementation interventions.

摘要

背景

临床实践指南(CPG)是协助从业者和利益相关者做出医疗保健决策的声明。方法学质量较低的指南可能会影响决策,并对非传染性疾病的临床结果产生负面影响,如因脂质管理不善而加重的心血管疾病。我们评估了血脂异常管理CPG的质量,并综合了最新的药物治疗建议。

方法

按照国际建议进行了系统评价。在PubMed、Scopus和Trip数据库中检索关于成人血脂异常药物治疗的CPG。使用AGREE II(方法学质量)和AGREE-REX(推荐卓越性)工具对符合条件的文章进行评估。使用描述性统计来汇总数据。对最新的指南(2019年后发表)在探索性分析中对其建议进行了定性综合。

结果

总体而言,选择了由专业协会撰写的66份指南(75%),主要针对临床医生。AGREE II领域的范围和目的(89%)以及表述清晰度(97%),以及AGREE-REX项目的临床适用性(77.0%)得分最高。相反,指南在方法学上执行/记录不佳(46%),几乎没有提供关于实际建议可实施性的数据(38%)。关于药物治疗的建议总体相似,在补充剂的使用和药物的可获得性方面存在细微差异。

结论

需要高质量的血脂异常CPG,特别是在北美和欧洲以外的地区,并且要严格涉及证据综合、评估和建议,尤其是要指导初级保健决策。CPG开发者应考虑利益相关者的价值观和偏好,并使现有声明适用于个体人群和医疗保健系统,以确保成功实施干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验