School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial & Stomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Research Center of Dental Esthetics and Biomechanics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Stomatology, Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial & Stomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Research Center of Dental Esthetics and Biomechanics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
J Dent. 2024 Aug;147:105109. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105109. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bioactive glass (BAG) in preventing dental erosion in primary teeth.
Enamel and dentin specimens (2 × 2 × 2 mm) were obtained from extracted primary teeth, which were randomly divided into the following groups based on the pretreatments (n = 12): DW (deionized water), NaF (2 % sodium fluoride), 2BAG (2 % BAG), 4BAG (4 % BAG), 6BAG (6 % BAG), and 8BAG (8 % BAG). The specimens were immersed in the respective solutions for 2 min and subjected to in vitro erosive challenges (4 × 5 min/d) for 5 d. The erosive enamel loss (EEL), erosive dentin loss (EDL), and the thickness of the demineralized organic matrix (DOM) were measured using a contact profilometer. The surface microhardness (SMH) was measured, and the percentage of SMH loss (%SMHL) was calculated. The surface morphology and mineral composition were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), respectively.
After the erosive challenges, the EEL, EDL, and%SMHL of the 2BAG, 4BAG, 6BAG, and 8BAG groups significantly reduced, with the greatest reduction was observed in the 6BAG (EEL: 6.5 ± 0.2 μm;%SMHL in enamel: 12.8 ± 2.6; EDL: 7.9 ± 0.3 μm; %SMHL in dentin: 22.1 ± 2.7) and 8BAG groups (EEL: 6.4 ± 0.4 μm;%SMHL in enamel: 11.0 ± 1.9; EDL: 7.8 ± 0.5 μm; %SMHL in dentin: 22.0 ± 2.5) (P < 0.05). With increasing BAG concentrations, the number of surface deposits containing Ca, P, and Si increased.
6BAG was the most effective for preventing dental erosion in primary teeth and showed a particularly strong potential for dentin erosion prevention.
Bioactive glass, especially at a 6 % concentration, has proven effective in reducing erosive tooth wear and surface microhardness loss while also protecting demineralized organic matrix in primary dentin.
本研究旨在评估生物活性玻璃(BAG)在预防乳牙龋齿中的有效性。
从拔除的乳牙中获得釉质和牙本质标本(2×2×2mm),根据预处理将其随机分为以下组(n=12):DW(去离子水)、NaF(2%氟化钠)、2BAG(2%BAG)、4BAG(4%BAG)、6BAG(6%BAG)和 8BAG(8%BAG)。将标本浸入相应溶液中 2 分钟,然后进行体外侵蚀挑战(每天 4×5 分钟),共 5 天。使用接触式轮廓仪测量侵蚀性釉质丧失(EEL)、侵蚀性牙本质丧失(EDL)和脱矿有机基质(DOM)的厚度。测量表面显微硬度(SMH),并计算表面显微硬度损失的百分比(%SMHL)。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散 X 射线光谱(EDS)分别评估表面形貌和矿物组成。
在侵蚀性挑战后,2BAG、4BAG、6BAG 和 8BAG 组的 EEL、EDL 和%SMHL 显著降低,6BAG 组(EEL:6.5±0.2μm;%SMHL 釉质:12.8±2.6;EDL:7.9±0.3μm;%SMHL 牙本质:22.1±2.7)和 8BAG 组(EEL:6.4±0.4μm;%SMHL 釉质:11.0±1.9;EDL:7.8±0.5μm;%SMHL 牙本质:22.0±2.5)的降低幅度最大(P<0.05)。随着 BAG 浓度的增加,含有 Ca、P 和 Si 的表面沉积物数量增加。
6BAG 是预防乳牙龋齿最有效的方法,对预防牙本质侵蚀具有特别强的潜力。
生物活性玻璃,特别是浓度为 6%时,已被证明可有效减少侵蚀性牙齿磨损和表面显微硬度损失,同时保护乳牙牙本质中的脱矿有机基质。