Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241248538. doi: 10.1177/19160216241248538.
The high incidence of pediatric acute otitis media (AOM) makes the implications of overdiagnosis and overtreatment far-reaching. Quality indicators (QIs) for AOM are limited, drawing from generalized upper respiratory infection QIs, or locally developed benchmarks. Recognizing this, we sought to develop pediatric AOM QIs to build a foundation for future quality improvement efforts.
Candidate indicators (CIs) were extracted from existing guidelines and position statements. The modified RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) appropriateness methodology was used to select the final QIs by an 11-member expert panel consisting of otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons, a pediatrician and family physician.
Twenty-seven CIs were identified after literature review, with an additional CI developed by the expert panel. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on 4 CIs as appropriate QIs. After an expert panel meeting and subsequent second round of evaluations, the panel agreed on 8 final QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care. The 8 final QIs focus on topics of antimicrobial management, specialty referral, and tympanostomy tube counseling.
Evidence of variable and substandard care persists in the diagnosis and management of pediatric AOM despite the existence of high-quality guidelines. This study proposes 8 QIs which compliment guideline recommendations and are meant to facilitate future quality improvement initiatives that can improve patient outcomes.
小儿急性中耳炎(AOM)发病率高,过度诊断和过度治疗的影响深远。AOM 的质量指标(QIs)有限,来源于一般性上呼吸道感染 QIs,或本地制定的基准。鉴于此,我们试图制定小儿 AOM QIs,为未来的质量改进工作奠定基础。
候选指标(CIs)从现有指南和立场声明中提取。由 11 名专家组成的小组(包括耳鼻喉科-头颈外科医生、儿科医生和家庭医生)使用经过修改的 RAND 公司/加州大学洛杉矶分校(RAND/UCLA)适宜性方法选择最终的 QIs。
文献回顾后确定了 27 个 CIs,专家组还制定了另外一个 CI。在第一轮评估后,专家组一致认为 4 个 CIs 为适当的 QIs。在专家小组会议和随后的第二轮评估后,专家组一致认为 8 个最终 QIs 为高质量护理的适当衡量标准。这 8 个最终的 QIs 侧重于抗菌药物管理、专科转诊和鼓膜切开术咨询等主题。
尽管存在高质量的指南,但在小儿 AOM 的诊断和管理方面仍存在可变和标准不足的情况。本研究提出了 8 个 QIs,补充了指南建议,旨在促进未来的质量改进计划,以改善患者的结果。