Walker Meghan J, Blackmore Kristina M, Chang Amy, Lambert-Côté Laurence, Turgeon Annie, Antoniou Antonis C, Bell Kathleen A, Broeders Mireille J M, Brooks Jennifer D, Carver Tim, Chiquette Jocelyne, Després Philippe, Easton Douglas F, Eisen Andrea, Eloy Laurence, Evans D Gareth, Fienberg Samantha, Joly Yann, Kim Raymond H, Kim Shana J, Knoppers Bartha M, Lofters Aisha K, Nabi Hermann, Paquette Jean-Sébastien, Pashayan Nora, Sheppard Amanda J, Stockley Tracy L, Dorval Michel, Simard Jacques, Chiarelli Anna M
Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON M5G 2L3, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 31;16(11):2116. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112116.
Risk-stratified breast screening has been proposed as a strategy to overcome the limitations of age-based screening. A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project, which will generate the first Canadian evidence on multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting to inform the implementation of risk-stratified screening. Recruited females aged 40-69 unaffected by breast cancer, with a previous mammogram, underwent multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment. The adoption of multifactorial risk assessment, the effectiveness of methods for collecting risk factor information and the costs of risk assessment were examined. Associations between participant characteristics and study sites, as well as data collection methods, were assessed using logistic regression; all -values are two-sided. Of the 4246 participants recruited, 88.4% completed a risk assessment, with 79.8%, 15.7% and 4.4% estimated at average, higher than average and high risk, respectively. The total per-participant cost for risk assessment was CAD 315. Participants who chose to provide risk factor information on paper/telephone (27.2%) vs. online were more likely to be older ( = 0.021), not born in Canada ( = 0.043), visible minorities ( = 0.01) and have a lower attained education ( < 0.0001) and perceived fair/poor health ( < 0.001). The 34.4% of participants requiring risk factor verification for missing/unusual values were more likely to be visible minorities ( = 0.009) and have a lower attained education ( ≤ 0.006). This study demonstrates the feasibility of risk assessment for risk-stratified screening at the population level. Implementation should incorporate an equity lens to ensure cancer-screening disparities are not widened.
风险分层的乳腺癌筛查已被提议作为一种克服基于年龄筛查局限性的策略。在“PERSPECTIVE I&I项目”中开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,该项目将产生加拿大首个关于人群环境中多因素乳腺癌风险评估的证据,以为风险分层筛查的实施提供信息。招募年龄在40 - 69岁、未患乳腺癌且之前进行过乳房X光检查的女性,对其进行多因素乳腺癌风险评估。研究考察了多因素风险评估的采用情况、收集风险因素信息方法的有效性以及风险评估的成本。使用逻辑回归评估参与者特征与研究地点以及数据收集方法之间的关联;所有P值均为双侧。在招募的4246名参与者中,88.4%完成了风险评估,其中平均风险、高于平均风险和高风险的估计比例分别为79.8%、15.7%和4.4%。每位参与者的风险评估总成本为315加元。选择通过纸质/电话(27.2%)而非在线方式提供风险因素信息的参与者更可能年龄较大(P = 0.021)、非加拿大出生(P = 0.043)、属于可见少数群体(P = 0.01),且受教育程度较低(P < 0.0001)以及自认为健康状况一般/较差(P < 0.001)。因缺失/异常值而需要风险因素验证的34.4%的参与者更可能是可见少数群体(P = 0.009)且受教育程度较低(P ≤ 0.006)。本研究证明了在人群层面进行风险分层筛查风险评估的可行性。实施过程应纳入公平视角,以确保癌症筛查差距不会扩大。