Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 3;14(1):15337. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65085-2.
Characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with superoptimal peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to compare the characteristics between COPD patients with superoptimal PIFR and those with optimal and sub-optimal PIFR. PIFR was measured using In-Check DIAL G16 and categorized into sub-optimal (PIFR lower than that required by the patient's device), optimal, and superoptimal (peak PIFR ≥ 90 L/min). Considering COPD patients with sub-optimal PIFR as the reference group, analyses were performed to identify PIFR-related factors. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) % of the predicted value (%pred). Among 444 post-bronchodilator-confirmed COPD patients from seven tertiary hospitals in South Korea, 98, 223, and 123 were classified into the sub-optimal, optimal, and superoptimal PIFR groups, respectively. The superoptimal PIFR group were younger, had an increased proportion of males, a higher body mass index, lowest number of comorbidities and less frequent exacerbation in the previous year, as well as the highest forced vital capacity %pred. The adjusted odds ratio for frequent exacerbation in the previous year was lower in the superoptimal PIFR group than in the sub-optimal PIFR group and was more pronounced in patients with an FEV%pred of < 70%. COPD patients with superoptimal PIFR have clinical characteristics different from those patients with the sub-optimal and optimal PIFR. Having a high inspiratory flow may be a favorable trait in COPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者存在超最佳吸气峰流速(PIFR)的特征尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在比较超最佳 PIFR 与最佳和次最佳 PIFR 的 COPD 患者的特征。使用 In-Check DIAL G16 测量 PIFR,并将其分为次最佳(PIFR 低于患者设备所需的水平)、最佳和超最佳(峰值 PIFR≥90 L/min)。考虑到 PIFR 次最佳的 COPD 患者作为参考组,进行了分析以确定与 PIFR 相关的因素。根据预测值的 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV)%(%pred)进行亚组分析。在韩国 7 家三级医院的 444 名支气管扩张剂后确诊的 COPD 患者中,分别有 98、223 和 123 例患者被归入 PIFR 次最佳、最佳和超最佳组。超最佳 PIFR 组更年轻,男性比例更高,体重指数更高,合并症数量最少,前一年的恶化次数更少,用力肺活量%pred 也最高。与 PIFR 次最佳组相比,前一年频繁恶化的调整后优势比在超最佳 PIFR 组较低,在 FEV%pred<70%的患者中更为明显。超最佳 PIFR 的 COPD 患者具有与次最佳和最佳 PIFR 患者不同的临床特征。吸气流量高可能是 COPD 的有利特征。