Hayes-Larson Eleanor, Zhou Yixuan, Wu Yingyan, Rojas-Saunero L Paloma, Seamans Marissa J, Gee Gilbert C, Brookmeyer Ron, Gilsanz Paola, Whitmer Rachel A, Mayeda Elizabeth Rose
Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Department of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 May 7;194(5):1304-1313. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae182.
Literature shows heterogeneous age-standardized dementia incidence rates across US Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders (AANHPI), but no estimates of population-representative dementia incidence exist due to lack of AANHPI longitudinal probability samples. We compared harmonized characteristics between AANHPI Kaiser Permanente Northern California members (KPNC cohort) and the target population of AANHPI 60+ with private or Medicare insurance using the California Health Interview Survey. We used stabilized inverse odds of selection weights (sIOSW) to estimate ethnicity-specific crude and age-standardized dementia incidence rates and cumulative risk by age 90 in the target population. Differences between the KPNC cohort and target population varied by ethnicity. The sIOSW eliminated most differences in larger ethnic groups; some differences remained in smaller groups. Estimated crude dementia incidence rates using sIOSW (vs unweighted) were similar in Chinese, Filipinos, Pacific Islanders and Vietnamese, and higher in Japanese, Koreans, and South Asians. Unweighted and weighted age-standardized incidence rates differed for South Asians. Unweighted and weighted cumulative risk were similar for all groups. We estimated the first population-representative dementia incidence rates and cumulative risk in AANHPI ethnic groups. We encountered some estimation problems, and weighted estimates were imprecise, highlighting challenges using weighting to extend inferences to target populations.
文献显示,美国亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民(AANHPI)的年龄标准化痴呆发病率存在差异,但由于缺乏AANHPI纵向概率样本,尚无针对具有人群代表性的痴呆发病率的估计。我们使用加州健康访谈调查,比较了北加州凯撒医疗集团(KPNC队列)的AANHPI成员与拥有私人保险或医疗保险的60岁及以上AANHPI目标人群的协调特征。我们使用稳定的选择权重逆概率(sIOSW)来估计目标人群中特定种族的粗痴呆发病率和年龄标准化痴呆发病率以及到90岁时的累积风险。KPNC队列与目标人群之间的差异因种族而异。sIOSW消除了较大种族群体中的大多数差异;较小群体中仍存在一些差异。使用sIOSW(与未加权相比)估计的粗痴呆发病率在华裔、菲律宾裔、太平洋岛民和越南裔中相似,而在日裔、韩裔和南亚裔中较高。南亚裔的未加权和加权年龄标准化发病率有所不同。所有群体的未加权和加权累积风险相似。我们估计了AANHPI种族群体中首个具有人群代表性的痴呆发病率和累积风险。我们遇到了一些估计问题,加权估计不准确,这凸显了使用加权将推断扩展到目标人群时面临的挑战。