Chinaliyev Azat, Saparbayev Samat, Zhakiyev Bazylbek, Chinaliyeva Gulinur, Khassenov Didar, Sagandykov Irlan, Abdelazim Ibrahim A, Donayeva Ainur, Amanzholkyzy Ainur, Alibekov Batyrbek, Arias Luis, Dzhantemirova Nazgul, Baubekov Zhenisbek, Karimsakova Bibigul
Department of Surgical Diseases No 2, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.
Department of Interventional Radiology, National Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Jun;19(2):187-197. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2024.139548. Epub 2024 May 10.
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a worldwide major health challenge, and it is a strong predictor of mortality and morbidity. The advances in PAD treatment have resulted in many therapeutic options or endovascular interventions (EVIs) for endovascular revascularization if drug therapy does not lead to substantial improvement. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported the efficacy of various EVIs such as atherectomy, stents, and medicated balloons over the traditional transluminal angioplasty; however, the standard treatment for PAD remains unclear due to the lack of head-to-head comparative studies between different EVIs. Additionally, the variable outcomes between clinical trials regarding the functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) make it difficult to ascertain the superiority of one particular EVI over another. Therefore, the latest PAD clinical trials should include head-to-head comparisons between different EVIs, and this review aimed to highlight the femoro-popliteal EVIs, evidence supporting each intervention and why those EVIs are used.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)是一项全球性的重大健康挑战,并且是死亡率和发病率的有力预测指标。PAD治疗的进展带来了许多治疗选择或血管内介入治疗(EVI),如果药物治疗不能带来实质性改善,这些治疗可用于血管内血运重建。随机对照试验(RCT)报告了诸如旋切术、支架和药物球囊等各种EVI相对于传统腔内血管成形术的疗效;然而,由于缺乏不同EVI之间的直接比较研究,PAD的标准治疗方法仍不明确。此外,临床试验在功能能力和生活质量(QoL)方面的结果存在差异,这使得难以确定一种特定EVI相对于另一种EVI的优越性。因此,最新的PAD临床试验应包括不同EVI之间的直接比较,本综述旨在突出股腘动脉EVI、支持每种干预措施的证据以及使用这些EVI的原因。