RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge, UK.
School of Social Policy, Health Services Management Centre, Park House, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827.
General practices are facing challenges such as rising patient demand and difficulties recruiting and retaining general practitioners. Greater use of digital technology has been advocated as a way of mitigating some of these challenges and improving patient access. This includes Digital First Primary Care, when a patient's first contact with primary care is through a digital route, either through a laptop or smartphone. The use of Digital First Primary Care has been expedited since COVID-19. There is little evidence of staff experiences of using Digital First Primary Care with more complex patients, such as those with multiple long-term conditions.
To understand the experiences of those with multiple long-term conditions of Digital First Primary Care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and stakeholders.
This was a qualitative evaluation, comprised of four distinct work packages: Work package 1: Locating the study within the wider context, engaging with literature, and co-designing the study approach and research questions with patients. Work package 2: Interviews with health professionals working across general practice and key expert topic stakeholders, including academics and policy-makers. Work package 3: Analysis of data and generation of themes, and testing findings with patients. Work package 4: Synthesis, reporting and dissemination.
The study commenced in January 2021 and in total 28 interviews were conducted with 14 health professionals and 15 stakeholders between January and August 2022. From the perspective of health professionals, Digital First Primary Care approaches could enable patients to speak with a clinician more quickly than traditional approaches. Those with multiple long-term conditions could submit healthcare readings from home, though health professionals felt patients may struggle navigating digital systems not designed to capture the nuances associated with living with multiple conditions. Clinicians expressed preferences for seeing patients face-to-face, particularly those with multiple long-term conditions, to identify non-verbal cues about a patient's health. Digital First Primary Care approaches provided an opportunity for clinicians to engage with the carers of patients living with multiple long-term conditions, yet there were concerns around obtaining consent and confidentiality. There remain debates among stakeholders about the nature and extent to which Digital First Primary Care impacts on staff workload.
At the time of data collection, general practices were facing considerable pressure to deliver care and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. While it was originally intended that the study would include interviews with patients with multiple long-term conditions and their carers, none of the general practices that took part in the study were willing and/or able to recruit patients and carers in the time available.
The rapid implementation of Digital First Primary Care, at a time of immense pressures, meant there has been little time for considering the impact on patients, including those with multiple long-term conditions. The impacts on care continuity depended largely on how surgeries implemented their approaches. Staff and stakeholders felt that Digital First Primary Care, as an additional route for accessing primary care, could be useful for patients with multiple long-term conditions but not at the expense of face-to-face consultations.
Future research obtaining patient and carer views of digital-first approaches, understanding the impacts on carers and how approaches are designed with patients with more complex conditions in mind, is essential.
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 16/138/31) and is published in full in ; Vol. 12, No. 21. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
全科医生面临着患者需求增加、招聘和留住全科医生困难等挑战。提倡更多地使用数字技术,是缓解这些挑战和改善患者就诊机会的一种方式。这包括数字优先初级保健,即患者与初级保健的第一次接触是通过数字渠道,无论是通过笔记本电脑还是智能手机。自 COVID-19 以来,数字优先初级保健的使用已经加快。几乎没有证据表明员工在使用数字优先初级保健方面的经验,特别是在处理患有多种慢性疾病的患者时。
了解患有多种慢性疾病的患者对数字优先初级保健的体验,从医疗保健专业人员和利益相关者的角度出发。
这是一项定性评估,包括四个不同的工作包:工作包 1:在更广泛的背景下定位研究,参与文献研究,并与患者共同设计研究方法和研究问题。工作包 2:对全科医生和关键专家利益相关者(包括学者和政策制定者)进行采访。工作包 3:分析数据并生成主题,并与患者一起测试发现。工作包 4:综合、报告和传播。
该研究于 2021 年 1 月开始,共对 14 名医疗保健专业人员和 15 名利益相关者进行了 28 次访谈,访谈时间为 2022 年 1 月至 8 月。从医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,数字优先初级保健方法可以使患者比传统方法更快地与临床医生交谈。那些患有多种慢性疾病的患者可以从家中提交医疗读数,但医疗保健专业人员认为,患者可能难以在为处理多种疾病而设计的数字系统中导航。临床医生表示他们更喜欢面对面地看到患者,特别是那些患有多种慢性疾病的患者,以识别患者健康的非语言线索。数字优先初级保健方法为临床医生提供了与患有多种慢性疾病的患者的照顾者接触的机会,但他们对获得同意和保密存在担忧。利益相关者之间仍然存在关于数字优先初级保健对员工工作量的性质和程度的争论。
在收集数据时,全科医生面临着提供护理和应对 COVID-19 大流行的巨大压力。虽然最初的计划是在研究中包括患有多种慢性疾病的患者及其照顾者的访谈,但参与研究的全科医生中没有一家愿意并/或能够在可用的时间内招募患者和照顾者。
在巨大压力下迅速实施数字优先初级保健,使得人们几乎没有时间考虑其对患者的影响,包括那些患有多种慢性疾病的患者。护理连续性的影响在很大程度上取决于手术如何实施他们的方法。工作人员和利益相关者认为,数字优先初级保健作为初级保健的附加途径,对患有多种慢性疾病的患者可能有用,但不能以牺牲面对面咨询为代价。
未来的研究需要获得患者和照顾者对数字优先方法的看法,了解对照顾者的影响,以及如何为患有更复杂疾病的患者设计方法,这是至关重要的。
该奖项由英国国家健康与保健卓越研究所(NIHR)健康与社会保健交付研究计划(NIHR 奖 REF:16/138/31)资助,并在 ;第 12 卷,第 21 期。有关该奖项的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 资助和奖项网站。