Suppr超能文献

直接去除青霉素 A 型药物不良反应过敏标签的效果:一项多中心全院前瞻性队列研究。

Effectiveness of direct delabelling of allergy labels in type A adverse drug reactions to penicillin: a multicentre hospitalwide prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Oct 1;79(10):2640-2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae270.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported penicillin allergy labels (PALs) are associated with adverse patient outcomes and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Removal of PALs via direct oral challenge (DOC) is associated with increased penicillin utilization post removal.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of direct delabelling (allergy label removal via medical reconciliation alone) of type A adverse drug reaction (ADR) PALs on inpatient prescribing.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2022 at two tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, patients aged ≥18 years with type A ADR PALs, as defined by the validated Antibiotic Allergy Assessment Tool, were offered direct delabelling or single-dose DOC. The primary endpoint was antibiotic use pre- and post-assessment (during index admission and 90 days post assessment). The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients delabelled in the direct delabelling and DOC cohorts in the electronic medical record at 90 days post assessment.

RESULTS

Allergy labels (n = 4108) were assessed for 488 participants, with 490 individual type A ADR PAL assessments included. Three hundred and thirty-seven patients were directly delabelled, 69 underwent DOC and 84 were not delabelled. There was increased use of any penicillin following direct delabelling (OR 19.19, 95% CI 2.48-148.36) and DOC (OR 56.98, 95% CI 6.82-476.19) during the index admission, higher in the DOC group compared with direct delabelling (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.39-6.37). Relabelling at 90 days was low with no statistically significant difference between direct delabelling (5/337; 1.5%) and DOC (0/69; 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both direct delabelling and DOC of type A ADR PALs increased penicillin usage; however, the impact was greatest with DOC. Most patients remain delabelled at 90 days.

摘要

背景

患者报告的青霉素过敏标签(PAL)与不良的患者结局和不适当的抗生素处方有关。通过直接口服挑战(DOC)去除 PAL 与去除后青霉素的利用率增加有关。

目的

评估通过医疗核对(仅通过药物过敏标签移除)直接去除 A 型药物不良反应(ADR)PAL 对住院患者处方的影响。

方法

在墨尔本的两家三级医院,从 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月,对年龄≥18 岁、经验证的抗生素过敏评估工具定义为 A 型 ADR PAL 的患者,提供直接去除或单次剂量的 DOC。主要终点是评估前和评估后(住院期间和评估后 90 天)的抗生素使用情况。次要终点是在评估后 90 天,电子病历中直接去除和 DOC 队列中患者的标签去除比例。

结果

对 4108 个过敏标签进行了 488 名患者的评估,共纳入 490 例个体 A 型 ADR PAL 评估。337 名患者直接去除了过敏标签,69 名患者接受了 DOC,84 名患者未去除过敏标签。直接去除后(比值比 19.19,95%置信区间 2.48-148.36)和 DOC 后(比值比 56.98,95%置信区间 6.82-476.19),任何青霉素的使用均增加,DOC 组高于直接去除组(比值比 2.97,95%置信区间 1.39-6.37)。90 天时重新贴标签的比例较低,直接去除(5/337;1.5%)和 DOC(0/69;0%)之间无统计学差异。

结论

直接去除和 DOC 均可增加 A 型 ADR PAL 青霉素的使用;然而,DOC 的影响最大。大多数患者在 90 天时仍未去除过敏标签。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验