Coler-Reilly Ariella, Pincus Zachary, Scheller Erica L, Civitelli Roberto
Division of Bone and Mineral Diseases, Musculoskeletal Research Center.
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 6:2024.08.02.606402. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.02.606402.
Many studies have compared gene expression in young and old samples to gain insights on aging, the primary risk factor for most major chronic diseases. However, these studies only describe associations, failing to distinguish drivers of aging from compensatory geroprotective responses and incidental downstream effects. Here, we introduce a workflow to characterize the causal effects of differentially expressed genes on lifespan. First, we performed a meta-analysis of 25 gene expression datasets comprising samples of various tissues from healthy, untreated adult mammals (humans, dogs, and rodents) at two distinct ages. We ranked each gene according to the number of distinct datasets in which the gene was differentially expressed with age in a consistent direction. The top age-upregulated genes were TMEM176A, EFEMP1, CP, and HLA-A; the top age-downregulated genes were CA4, SIAH, SPARC, and UQCR10. Second, the effects of the top ranked genes on lifespan were measured by applying post-developmental RNA interference of the corresponding ortholog in the nematode C. elegans (two trials, with roughly 100 animals per genotype per trial). Out of 10 age-upregulated and 9 age-downregulated genes that were tested, two age-upregulated genes (/CASP1 and /RSRC1) and four age-downregulated genes (/DIRC2, /SPARC, /CDC20, and /CA4) produced significant and reproducible lifespan extension. Notably, the data do not suggest that the direction of differential expression with age is predictive of the effect on lifespan. Our study provides novel insight into the relationship between differential gene expression and aging phenotypes, pilots an unbiased workflow that can be easily repeated and expanded, and pinpoints six genes with evolutionarily conserved, causal roles in the aging process for further study.
许多研究比较了年轻和年老样本中的基因表达,以深入了解衰老这一大多数主要慢性疾病的首要风险因素。然而,这些研究仅描述了相关性,未能区分衰老的驱动因素与代偿性的老年保护反应及偶然的下游效应。在此,我们引入了一种工作流程来表征差异表达基因对寿命的因果效应。首先,我们对25个基因表达数据集进行了荟萃分析,这些数据集包含来自健康、未经处理的成年哺乳动物(人类、狗和啮齿动物)两个不同年龄的各种组织样本。我们根据基因在不同数据集中随年龄呈一致方向差异表达的数量对每个基因进行排名。年龄上调的前几个基因是TMEM176A、EFEMP1、CP和HLA - A;年龄下调的前几个基因是CA4、SIAH、SPARC和UQCR10。其次,通过对线虫秀丽隐杆线虫中相应直系同源基因进行发育后RNA干扰来测量排名靠前的基因对寿命的影响(进行了两项试验,每项试验每种基因型约有100只动物)。在测试的10个年龄上调基因和9个年龄下调基因中,两个年龄上调基因(/CASP1和/RSRC1)和四个年龄下调基因(/DIRC2、/SPARC、/CDC20和/CA4)产生了显著且可重复的寿命延长。值得注意的是,数据并不表明随年龄差异表达的方向可预测对寿命的影响。我们的研究为差异基因表达与衰老表型之间的关系提供了新的见解,开创了一种可轻松重复和扩展的无偏工作流程,并确定了六个在衰老过程中具有进化保守因果作用的基因以供进一步研究。