Suppr超能文献

年轻腰椎管狭窄症患者行单纯椎板切除术与单侧及双侧椎弓根螺钉固定并单纯椎板切除术(无椎间融合)的比较研究:一项随机临床试验

The comparison study of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation and laminectomy alone without fusion interbody in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Hajilo Parisa, Imani Behzad, Zandi Shirdel, Mehrafshan Ali, Khazaei Salman

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Department of Operating Room, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 30;10(15):e35435. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35435. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after laminectomy surgery. Some surgeons use unilateral and bilateral fusion to provide sufficient stability to the lumbar spine. However, its strength, safety, and effectiveness in young patients are not widely known. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare surgical methods of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral fixation and laminectomy alone without interbody fusion in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

90 patients eligible for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups: laminectomy without fixation (A), laminectomy with unilateral fixation (B), and bilateral fixation (C). Pain, functional disability, quality of life, recurrent disc, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and fusion rate were evaluated and compared among the three groups six months post-surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.

RESULTS

Six months after surgery, the mean score of functional disability in the bilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (12.92 (3.30) vs 5.52 (1.91) and 4.30 (1.84), P < 0.05). Also, the highest mean score of pain after surgery was observed in the bilateral group (4.33 (0.70) vs 1.81(0.68) and 1.63(0.56), P < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the unilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (87.81 (5.67) vs 68.58 (3.08) and 56.07 (4.04), P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05) regarding fusion, recurrent disc herniation, and adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral fixation provides the same benefits as bilateral fixation but has the additional benefits of being less invasive and minimizing the disadvantages of other investigated techniques during and after surgery.

摘要

背景

关于椎板切除术后复发的危险因素有许多报道。一些外科医生采用单侧和双侧融合术来为腰椎提供足够的稳定性。然而,其在年轻患者中的强度、安全性和有效性尚未广为人知。因此,本研究旨在比较在年轻腰椎管狭窄症患者中,椎板切除术联合单侧和双侧固定与单纯椎板切除术(不进行椎间融合)的手术方法。

方法

通过便利抽样选择90例适合腰椎管狭窄症手术的患者,并随机分为三组:无固定椎板切除术组(A组)、单侧固定椎板切除术组(B组)和双侧固定椎板切除术组(C组)。在术后6个月对三组患者的疼痛、功能障碍、生活质量、椎间盘复发、相邻节段疾病(ASD)和融合率进行评估和比较。使用SPSS 16版软件对数据进行分析。

结果

术后6个月,双侧固定组的功能障碍平均评分显著高于其他组(12.92(3.30)对5.52(1.91)和4.30(1.84),P<0.05)。此外,双侧固定组术后疼痛平均评分最高(4.33(0.70)对1.81(0.68)和1.63(0.56),P<0.05)。单侧固定组的生活质量平均评分显著高于其他组(87.81(5.67)对68.58(3.08)和56.07(4.04),P<0.05)。在融合、复发性椎间盘突出和相邻节段疾病方面,各组之间未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

单侧固定与双侧固定具有相同的益处,但具有额外的优势,即侵入性较小,并能在手术期间和术后将其他所研究技术的缺点降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fc/11336607/a217f109f6bb/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验