Ciccarese Chiara, Büttner Thomas, Cerbone Linda, Zampiva Ilaria, Monteiro Fernando Sabino M, Basso Umberto, Pichler Martin, Vitale Maria Giuseppa, Fiala Ondrej, Roviello Giandomenico, Kopp Ray Manneh, Carrozza Francesco, Pichler Renate, Grillone Francesco, Calabuig Esther Pérez, Zeppellini Annalisa, Küronya Zsófia, Galli Luca, Facchini Gaetano, Sunela Kaisa, Mosca Alessandra, Molina-Cerrillo Javier, Spinelli Gian Paolo, Ansari Jawaher, Scala Alessandro, Mollica Veronica, Grande Enrique, Buti Sebastiano, Kanesvaran Ravindran, Zakopoulou Roubini, Bamias Aristotelis, Rizzo Mimma, Massari Francesco, Iacovelli Roberto, Santoni Matteo
Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany.
Int J Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;155(11):2036-2046. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35141. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) carrying sarcomatoid features (sRCC) has aggressive biology and poor prognosis. First-line immunotherapy (IO)-based combinations have improved the outcome of clear cell RCC patients, including that of sRCC. Real-world data confirming the adequate first-line management of sRCC is largely lacking. We investigated the clinical features and the outcome of sRCC patients treated with IO-based combinations within the ARON-1 study population (NCT05287464). The primary objective was to define the incidence and baseline clinical characteristics of sRCC compared with non-sRCC patients. The secondary objective was to describe the outcome of sRCC patients based on type of first-line treatment (IO + IO vs. IO + tyrosin kinase inhibitor [TKI]). We identified 1362 mRCC patients with IMDC intermediate or poor risk, 226 sRCC and 1136 non-sRCC. These two subgroups did not differ in terms of baseline characteristics. The median overall survival (OS) was 26.8 months (95%CI 21.6-44.2) in sRCC and 35.3 months (95%CI 30.2-40.4) in non-sRCC patients (p = .013). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in non-sRCC patients compared to sRCC (14.5 vs. 12.3 months, p = .064). In patients treated with first-line IO + TKI the median OS was 34.4 months compared to 26.4 months of those who received IO + IO (p = .729). The median PFS was 12.4 months with IO + TKI and 12.3 months with IO + IO (p = .606). In conclusion, we confirm that sRCC are aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. IO-based combinations improve survival outcomes of sRCC patients, regardless from the type of strategy (IO + IO versus IO + TKI) adopted.
具有肉瘤样特征的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC,即sRCC)生物学行为侵袭性强,预后较差。基于一线免疫治疗(IO)的联合方案改善了透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的预后,包括sRCC患者。目前在很大程度上缺乏证实sRCC一线治疗恰当性的真实世界数据。我们在ARON-1研究人群(NCT05287464)中调查了接受基于IO联合方案治疗的sRCC患者的临床特征和预后。主要目标是确定与非sRCC患者相比,sRCC的发病率和基线临床特征。次要目标是根据一线治疗类型(IO + IO与IO + 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂[TKI])描述sRCC患者的预后。我们纳入了1362例国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库(IMDC)中危或高危的mRCC患者,其中226例为sRCC,1136例为非sRCC。这两个亚组在基线特征方面无差异。sRCC患者的中位总生存期(OS)为26.8个月(95%CI 21.6 - 44.2),非sRCC患者为35.3个月(95%CI 30.2 - 40.4)(p = 0.013)。非sRCC患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)比sRCC患者长(14.5对12.3个月,p = 0.064)。接受一线IO + TKI治疗的患者中位OS为34.4个月,而接受IO + IO治疗的患者为26.4个月(p = 0.729)。IO + TKI组的中位PFS为12.4个月,IO + IO组为12.3个月(p = 0.606)。总之,我们证实sRCC是预后较差的侵袭性肿瘤。基于IO的联合方案可改善sRCC患者的生存结局,无论采用何种治疗策略(IO + IO还是IO + TKI)。