Maternal and Child Health Training of Traditional Birth Attendants and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION

In remote communities, maternal and child health is often compromised due to limited access to healthcare. Simultaneously, these communities historically rely greatly on traditional birth attendants (TBAs). However, optimal integration of these traditional methods with modern healthcare practices remains a topic of debate. We assessed the effect of maternal and child health training of traditional birth attendants on adverse pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer the above research question. We independently screened studies using databases like PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL, extracted data, and assessed the study quality. Due to fewer original studies in this field, we considered both pre-post and between-group differences to assess the effect of differences. These were synthesised separately, assessed against a p-value function, and subjected to sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

We included six interventional studies. Training TBAs reduced the risk of perinatal mortality [0.69, 0.61-0.78] and 7-day neonatal mortality [0.65, 0.53-0.80] but not stillbirth [0.70, 0.39-1.26]. In randomized controlled trials, there is a lower risk of perinatal mortality [0.73, 0.67-0.79] and neonatal mortality [0.70, 0.62-0.80] but not stillbirth [0.81, 0.56-1.18] with trained traditional birth attendants. There are methodological concerns with most existing studies, including domains like allocation concealment.

DISCUSSION

There is some evidence of the benefit of training TBAs, though of a low to very low certainty. Due to fewer studies, inconsistent estimates for different critical outcomes, and concerns with the existing studies, further well-designed studies can give more insights. They can also help optimize the contents of TBA training interventions.

PROTOCOL

CRD42023412935 (PROSPERO).