Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药治疗老年人疼痛的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for pain in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Sydney Local Health District, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;90(12):3097-3118. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16234. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Abstract

AIMS

In many countries, pain is the most common indication for use of antidepressants in older adults. We reviewed the evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of antidepressants, compared to all alternatives for pain in older adults (aged ≥65 years).

METHODS

Trials published from inception to 1 February 2024, were retrieved from 13 databases. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study and participant characteristics, primary efficacy (pain scores, converted to 0-100 scale) and harms. Estimates for efficacy were pooled using a random effects model and reported as difference in means and 95% CI. Quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 1369 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently studied antidepressants were duloxetine and amitriptyline (6/15 studies each). Pain related to knee osteoarthritis was the most studied (6/15 studies). For knee osteoarthritis, antidepressants did not provide a statistically significant effect for the immediate term (0-2 weeks), (-5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.5 to 0.3), but duloxetine provided a statistically significant, albeit a very small effect in the intermediate term, (≥6 weeks and <12 months), (-9.1, 95% CI: -11.8 to -6.4). Almost half (7/15) of the studies reported increased withdrawal of participants in the antidepressant treatment group vs. the comparator group due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

For most chronic painful conditions, the benefits and harms of antidepressant medicines are unclear. This evidence is predominantly from trials with sample sizes of <100, have disclosed industry ties and classified as having unclear or high risk of bias.

摘要

目的

在许多国家,疼痛是老年人使用抗抑郁药最常见的指征。我们回顾了随机对照试验对抗抑郁药在治疗老年人(年龄≥65 岁)疼痛方面的疗效和安全性的证据,将其与所有其他替代疗法进行了比较。

方法

从研究开始到 2024 年 2 月 1 日,从 13 个数据库中检索到已发表的试验。两名独立审查员提取了关于研究和参与者特征、主要疗效(疼痛评分,转换为 0-100 量表)和危害的数据。使用随机效应模型对疗效进行汇总,并以均值和 95%置信区间报告差异。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入试验的质量。

结果

15 项研究(n=1369 名参与者)符合纳入标准。研究最多的抗抑郁药是度洛西汀和阿米替林(各有 6 项研究)。研究最多的是膝关节骨关节炎相关疼痛(15 项研究中有 6 项)。对于膝关节骨关节炎,抗抑郁药在短期(0-2 周)内没有提供统计学上的显著效果(-5.6,95%置信区间[CI]:-11.5 至 0.3),但度洛西汀在中期(≥6 周且<12 个月)内提供了统计学上显著的、尽管很小的效果(-9.1,95%CI:-11.8 至-6.4)。近一半(7/15)的研究报告称,由于不良事件,抗抑郁药物治疗组的参与者退出率高于对照组。

结论

对于大多数慢性疼痛性疾病,抗抑郁药的益处和危害尚不清楚。这一证据主要来自样本量<100 的试验,这些试验有披露行业关系,被归类为偏倚风险不明确或高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a68c/11602952/25cd9da0b880/BCP-90-3097-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验