Suppr超能文献

Xpert MTB/RIF 和 MTBDRplus 在巴西里约热内卢结核病实验室规划环境中的表现。

The performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus within a Programmatic setting at TB Laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Secretaria Estadual da Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul, Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2024 Sep 13;57:e004162024. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0167-2024. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies in routine settings have confirmed the high accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detecting rifampicin resistance (RR) and the first-line probe assay (FL-LPA) for detecting both RR and isoniazid resistance (INHR).

METHODS

The performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA was evaluated in 180 Mycobacterium tuberculosis samples collected from January 2018 to December 2019 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The results were compared with those from BACTEC MGIT 960 culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST). Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the samples with discordant results.

RESULTS

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay showed a sensitivity (Se) of 93.3% and a specificity (Sp) of 97.6%, detecting RR. The performance of FL-LPA to identify RIF and INH resistance was, respectively, (Se) 100% and 83.3% and (Sp) 98.8% and 100%. Among 18 clinical isolates with INHR detected by FL-LPA, mutations in the katG gene were observed in 100% of samples, of which only two (11.1%) had mutations in both katG and inhA genes. Overall, the discordant results were identified in 9 (5%) samples. Among the four Xpert RIF-resistant and DST-sensitive, two harbored mutations in rpoB Leu430Pro. Among the four FL-LPA-sensitive and DST-resistant, one had a mutation in inhA 17G>T. FL-LPA showed high accuracy in detecting RR and INHR.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTBDRplus test demonstrated excellent performance in detecting RR, and INHR in clinical isolates under routine conditions at a reference laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Incorporating both tests can improve drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes and monitor the INHR incidence.

摘要

背景

在常规环境中,很少有研究证实 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测法对利福平耐药(RR)的高准确性,以及用于检测 RR 和异烟肼耐药(INHR)的一线探针检测法(FL-LPA)。

方法

在巴西里约热内卢,我们评估了 Xpert MTB/RIF 和 MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA 在 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间收集的 180 份结核分枝杆菌样本中的性能。结果与 BACTEC MGIT 960 培养和药敏试验(DST)进行了比较。对结果不一致的样本进行全基因组测序。

结果

Xpert MTB/RIF 检测法对 RR 的检测灵敏度(Se)为 93.3%,特异性(Sp)为 97.6%。FL-LPA 识别 RIF 和 INH 耐药的性能分别为(Se)100%和 83.3%,(Sp)98.8%和 100%。在 FL-LPA 检测到的 18 株 INHR 临床分离株中,katG 基因的突变在 100%的样本中被观察到,其中只有 2 个(11.1%)样本同时存在 katG 和 inhA 基因的突变。总体而言,在 9(5%)个样本中发现了不一致的结果。在 4 个 Xpert RIF 耐药和 DST 敏感的样本中,有 2 个样本存在 rpoB Leu430Pro 突变。在 4 个 FL-LPA 敏感和 DST 耐药的样本中,有 1 个样本存在 inhA 17G>T 突变。FL-LPA 在检测 RR 和 INHR 方面具有较高的准确性。

结论

在巴西里约热内卢的一家参考实验室中,MTBDRplus 试验在常规条件下对 RR 和 INHR 检测显示出卓越的性能。结合这两种检测方法可以提高耐多药结核病的治疗效果,并监测 INHR 的发生率。

相似文献

1
The performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus within a Programmatic setting at TB Laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2024 Sep 13;57:e004162024. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0167-2024. eCollection 2024.
7
Line probe assay test in new cases of tuberculosis with rifampicin resistance not detected by Xpert MTB/RIF.
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2022 Oct-Dec;11(4):429-434. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_176_22.

本文引用的文献

2
Isoniazid Monoresistance and Antituberculosis Treatment Outcome in Persons With Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazil.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 8;11(1):ofad691. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad691. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Rapid molecular diagnostics to detect resistance to second-line anti-TB drugs.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 May 1;26(5):385-387. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.22.0121.
7
Characterization of heteroresistance by genotyping.
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2020 Oct-Dec;9(4):368-372. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_132_20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验