Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Secretaria Estadual da Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul, Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2024 Sep 13;57:e004162024. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0167-2024. eCollection 2024.
Few studies in routine settings have confirmed the high accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detecting rifampicin resistance (RR) and the first-line probe assay (FL-LPA) for detecting both RR and isoniazid resistance (INHR).
The performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA was evaluated in 180 Mycobacterium tuberculosis samples collected from January 2018 to December 2019 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The results were compared with those from BACTEC MGIT 960 culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST). Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the samples with discordant results.
The Xpert MTB/RIF assay showed a sensitivity (Se) of 93.3% and a specificity (Sp) of 97.6%, detecting RR. The performance of FL-LPA to identify RIF and INH resistance was, respectively, (Se) 100% and 83.3% and (Sp) 98.8% and 100%. Among 18 clinical isolates with INHR detected by FL-LPA, mutations in the katG gene were observed in 100% of samples, of which only two (11.1%) had mutations in both katG and inhA genes. Overall, the discordant results were identified in 9 (5%) samples. Among the four Xpert RIF-resistant and DST-sensitive, two harbored mutations in rpoB Leu430Pro. Among the four FL-LPA-sensitive and DST-resistant, one had a mutation in inhA 17G>T. FL-LPA showed high accuracy in detecting RR and INHR.
The MTBDRplus test demonstrated excellent performance in detecting RR, and INHR in clinical isolates under routine conditions at a reference laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Incorporating both tests can improve drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes and monitor the INHR incidence.
在常规环境中,很少有研究证实 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测法对利福平耐药(RR)的高准确性,以及用于检测 RR 和异烟肼耐药(INHR)的一线探针检测法(FL-LPA)。
在巴西里约热内卢,我们评估了 Xpert MTB/RIF 和 MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA 在 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间收集的 180 份结核分枝杆菌样本中的性能。结果与 BACTEC MGIT 960 培养和药敏试验(DST)进行了比较。对结果不一致的样本进行全基因组测序。
Xpert MTB/RIF 检测法对 RR 的检测灵敏度(Se)为 93.3%,特异性(Sp)为 97.6%。FL-LPA 识别 RIF 和 INH 耐药的性能分别为(Se)100%和 83.3%,(Sp)98.8%和 100%。在 FL-LPA 检测到的 18 株 INHR 临床分离株中,katG 基因的突变在 100%的样本中被观察到,其中只有 2 个(11.1%)样本同时存在 katG 和 inhA 基因的突变。总体而言,在 9(5%)个样本中发现了不一致的结果。在 4 个 Xpert RIF 耐药和 DST 敏感的样本中,有 2 个样本存在 rpoB Leu430Pro 突变。在 4 个 FL-LPA 敏感和 DST 耐药的样本中,有 1 个样本存在 inhA 17G>T 突变。FL-LPA 在检测 RR 和 INHR 方面具有较高的准确性。
在巴西里约热内卢的一家参考实验室中,MTBDRplus 试验在常规条件下对 RR 和 INHR 检测显示出卓越的性能。结合这两种检测方法可以提高耐多药结核病的治疗效果,并监测 INHR 的发生率。