Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析在慢性伤口微生物学诊断试验中的准确性。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in chronic wound's microbiology.

机构信息

Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine, Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

WINTER: Wounds, Innovation, ThErapeutics and Research Group, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Sep;21(9):e70063. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70063.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of non-culture-based methodologies for detecting microorganisms in chronic wounds.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of alternative tests in chronic wound samples, excluding studies focused on animal samples or unrelated conditions. The search encompassed PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases, employing the QUADAS-2 tool for risk of bias assessment. Our search included the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases, and we assessed the risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. A meta-analysis was conducted on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and colorimetric methods to determine sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver-operating characteristic (sROC) curves using a random-effects model. For methods not suitable for quantitative synthesis, a narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies involving various types of chronic wounds were analysed, revealing diverse diagnostic methods including fluorescence, PCR, colorimetry, voltammetry, electronic nose, biosensors, enzymatic methods, staining and microscopy. Combining fluorescence with clinical signs and symptoms (CSS) versus culture showed significant accuracy. Colorimetry demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.3. PCR generally exhibited good accuracy, although significant heterogeneity was noted, even in subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a broad spectrum of diagnostic approaches, highlighting the superior diagnostic accuracy achieved when microbiological analysis is combined with clinical assessments. However, the heterogeneity and methodological variations across studies present challenges in meta-analysis. Future research should aim for standardized and homogeneous study designs to enhance the assessment of diagnostic accuracy for alternative methods.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估非培养基方法在检测慢性伤口中微生物方面的诊断准确性。

方法

我们系统地回顾了评估替代检测方法在慢性伤口样本中的诊断准确性的研究,排除了专注于动物样本或不相关条件的研究。检索涵盖了 PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,并使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估偏倚风险。我们的检索包括 PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,并使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估偏倚风险。对聚合酶链反应(PCR)和比色法进行了荟萃分析,以确定使用随机效应模型的敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比和汇总受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线。对于不适合定量综合的方法,进行了叙述性综合。

结果

分析了 19 项涉及各种类型慢性伤口的研究,揭示了多种诊断方法,包括荧光、PCR、比色法、伏安法、电子鼻、生物传感器、酶法、染色和显微镜检查。荧光与临床体征和症状(CSS)与培养相结合显示出显著的准确性。比色法显示出低敏感性但高特异性,诊断优势比为 6.3。PCR 通常表现出良好的准确性,尽管存在显著的异质性,甚至在亚组分析中也是如此。

结论

本研究确定了广泛的诊断方法,突出了将微生物分析与临床评估相结合时获得的卓越诊断准确性。然而,研究之间的异质性和方法学差异给荟萃分析带来了挑战。未来的研究应旨在采用标准化和同质化的研究设计,以提高对替代方法诊断准确性的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae8/11419733/b9c62ca6fa93/IWJ-21-e70063-g017.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验