Suppr超能文献

在临床环境中,氯胺酮/艾司氯胺酮治疗双相抑郁的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting.

机构信息

Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and the Yale Psychiatric Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.

Corresponding Author: Samuel T. Wilkinson, MD, Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and the Yale Psychiatric Hospital, 100 York St, Ste 2J, New Haven, CT 06511 (

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 2;85(4):24m15376. doi: 10.4088/JCP.24m15376.

Abstract

Bipolar disorder represents a significant source of morbidity and elevated mortality risk. Ketamine has emerged as a powerful antidepressant; however, there have been few trials of ketamine in bipolar depression and no trials with esketamine in bipolar depression, and few data exist from real-world settings. Here, we report outcomes from a cohort of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/ esketamine in a real-world setting. Patients with treatment refractory bipolar depression were referred to Yale Psychiatric Hospital Interventional Services for treatment from October 2014 to November 2023. Appropriate patients were treated with intravenous (IV) ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes) or intranasal esketamine (56 or 84 mg). Diagnosis of bipolar depression was done by clinical evaluation by an attending psychiatrist, based on criteria. Clinical outcomes were tabulated from medical records. Overall, 45 patients with bipolar depression were treated with IV ketamine or intranasal (IN) esketamine during the time period specified. Depression severity outcomes were available for 38 patients that completed an acute series, defined as treatment twice weekly for up to 4 weeks. Overall, 15/38 (39%) achieved clinical response (≥50% improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) and 5/38 (13.2%) achieved remission (≤10 on MADRS) following the acute series. Mean MADRS scores decreased from 31.1 to 19.2 (38.3% mean improvement). Safety data (hypomania/manic symptoms) were available for all 45 patients (518 patient-months of follow-up). No patients experienced any mania/hypomania during the acute series phase (when treatments are given twice weekly). However, 13/45 (28.9%) patients experienced symptoms consistent with a hypomanic or manic episode at some point following the acute phase while continuing to receive ketamine or esketamine during a maintenance phase. There were 16 manic/hypomanic events, indicating 1 event for every 2.7 patient-years. Only 1 event was severe and resulted in hospitalization. In a small sample of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/esketamine, no evidence of mania/hypomania was seen during the acute phase of treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate whether ketamine or esketamine confers heightened risk of affective switch during maintenance treatment.

摘要

双相情感障碍是一个重要的发病源,会增加死亡风险。氯胺酮已被证明是一种有效的抗抑郁药物;然而,在双相情感障碍的治疗中,氯胺酮的临床试验很少,用艾司氯胺酮的临床试验则更少,而且从现实环境中获得的数据也很少。在这里,我们报告了在现实环境中使用氯胺酮/艾司氯胺酮治疗的双相情感障碍患者的结果。从 2014 年 10 月至 2023 年 11 月,治疗抵抗性双相情感障碍患者被转诊到耶鲁精神病院介入服务进行治疗。适当的患者接受静脉注射(IV)氯胺酮(40 分钟内 0.5 毫克/公斤)或鼻内艾司氯胺酮(56 或 84 毫克)治疗。双相情感障碍的诊断由主治精神病医生根据临床评估和标准进行。临床结果从病历中进行了整理。

在指定的时间内,45 名双相情感障碍患者接受了 IV 氯胺酮或 IN 艾司氯胺酮治疗。有 38 名完成急性系列治疗的患者可获得抑郁严重程度的结果,定义为每周两次治疗,最多持续 4 周。总的来说,15/38(39%)的患者在急性系列治疗后达到了临床反应( Montgomery-Asberg 抑郁评定量表 [MADRS] 改善≥50%),5/38(13.2%)的患者达到了缓解(MADRS 评分≤10)。MADRS 评分均值从 31.1 降至 19.2(平均改善 38.3%)。所有 45 名患者(518 患者月的随访)都有安全性数据(轻躁狂/躁狂症状)。在急性系列治疗期间,没有患者出现任何躁狂/轻躁狂症状(当每周两次给予治疗时)。然而,在急性阶段之后的某个时候,13/45(28.9%)的患者继续接受氯胺酮或艾司氯胺酮治疗时,出现了与轻躁狂或躁狂发作一致的症状。共有 16 次躁狂/轻躁狂事件,即每 2.7 患者年发生 1 次事件。只有 1 次事件严重并导致住院。

在一小部分接受氯胺酮/艾司氯胺酮治疗的双相情感障碍患者中,在治疗的急性阶段没有观察到躁狂/轻躁狂的证据。需要进一步的研究来评估氯胺酮或艾司氯胺酮在维持治疗期间是否会增加情感转换的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验