Suppr超能文献

100%自体富血小板血浆和 100%自体血清治疗干眼症的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of 100% autologous platelet-rich plasma and 100% autologous serum in dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Mahidol University Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Ophthalmology, Mahidol University Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

出版信息

BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 8;9(1):e001857. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points.

RESULTS

At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04683796.

摘要

目的

比较未经稀释的自体富血小板血浆(APRP)和自体血清(AS)治疗中重度干眼(DED)患者的疗效。

方法和分析

进行了一项单中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性临床试验。将 96 名 OSDI 评分≥23 分和/或 Oxford 染色等级≥2 分的成年 DED 患者随机分为接受 100% APRP(n=48)或 100% AS(n=48)治疗 4 周。主要结局包括治疗 4 周后 OSDI 评分和 Oxford 分级量表测量的眼表染色。次要结局包括泪膜破裂时间、Schirmer 试验、睑板腺质量和表达力以及不良事件。通过估计两组间 OSDI 评分差值的 95%置信区间,以 4.18 分的预设差值评估 OSDI 评分的非劣效性。

结果

治疗 4 周后,两组间 OSDI 评分降低无显著差异,组间差值(100%APRP-100%AS)为 1.41(95%CI-1.26,4.08,p=0.299)。上限小于预设差值,表明 100%APRP 与 100%AS 相比具有非劣效性。治疗后达到 Oxford 等级 0-1 的概率在两组间无显著差异,OR 为 0.61(95%CI0.25,1.52,p=0.288)。两组间次要结局无显著差异。

结论

在短期治疗中,100%APRP 在减轻中重度 DED 的干眼症状和眼表染色方面并不劣于 100%AS。

临床试验注册号

NCT04683796。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b1/11474780/d2f03b808c95/bmjophth-9-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验