Suppr超能文献

与 Foley 球囊相比,Dilapan S 在引产术前促宫颈成熟中的疗效——一项非劣效性试验

Efficacy of Dilapan S compared to foley balloon in preinduction cervical ripening-a noninferiority trial.

作者信息

Leela Krishna Priya, Somasundaram Maheswari, Nujum Zinia T, Maheshwari Subbarayan Latha

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PSGIMSR, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India (Leela, Somasundaram).

Government Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India (Nujum).

出版信息

AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Aug 13;4(4):100387. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100387. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for induction of labor is increasing in present obstetric practice. The available non-pharmacological methods for cervical ripening at term are Foley balloon and Dilapan-S. With the gaining popularity of Dilapan-S worldwide, there are very few clinical trials conducted in India to evaluate its effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of Dilapan-S and Foley balloons for pre-induction cervical ripening.

STUDY DESIGN

This single-center randomized non-inferiority trial included primi- and multi-gravida women between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation and unfavourable cervix with a Bishop's score between 0 and 2. Using a random number table, patients were assigned to study Group 1 Dilapan-S and to control Group 2 Foley balloon. Dilapan-S or Foley balloon was inserted intracervically and assessed for dilation after 12 hours. Patients with unfavourable dilatation were further provided prostaglandins (PgE 1 and 2) for further augmentation of induction. Primary outcome measures included improvement in Bishop's score, and mode of delivery, followed by time to delivery from intervention, use of other augmentation methods, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

After screening, 296 patients with Bishop score less than 2, (148 in each group) were enrolled in the study. The number of patients who had vaginal delivery was comparable between both groups (=.72), and so were the maternal outcomes. Two cases of cord prolapse occurred with Foley balloon. Group 2 showed significant improvement in Bishop's score (<.001), and Group 1 had a significantly higher use of augmentation with PgE1 (-.01) and PgE2 (<.001). The number of contractions was significantly lower in Group 1 (<.001), and contraction intensity was higher in Group 2. There was no significant difference in cesarean delivery for failed induction of labor between the groups (=.72). Based on the primary outcome measure, Dilapan-S was found to be non-inferior to the Foley balloon.

CONCLUSION

Dilapan-S is non-inferior to Foley balloon in achieving pre-induction cervical ripening in term pregnancies, and therefore Dilapan-S can be suggested as an alternative in clinical practice with minimal risks.

摘要

背景

在当前产科实践中,引产的需求日益增加。足月时可用的非药物宫颈成熟方法有Foley球囊和Dilapan-S。随着Dilapan-S在全球范围内越来越受欢迎,在印度进行的评估其有效性的临床试验很少。

目的

比较Dilapan-S和Foley球囊在引产术前宫颈成熟方面的疗效。

研究设计

这项单中心随机非劣效性试验纳入了妊娠37至41周、宫颈条件不佳且Bishop评分在0至2分之间的初产妇和经产妇。使用随机数字表,将患者分为研究1组Dilapan-S和对照组2组Foley球囊。将Dilapan-S或Foley球囊宫颈内放置,12小时后评估宫颈扩张情况。宫颈扩张不佳的患者进一步给予前列腺素(PgE1和2)以进一步加强引产。主要结局指标包括Bishop评分的改善、分娩方式,其次是干预后至分娩的时间、其他加强方法的使用以及母婴结局。

结果

筛选后,296例Bishop评分小于2分的患者(每组148例)纳入研究。两组间阴道分娩的患者数量相当(P =.72),母婴结局也是如此。Foley球囊组发生了2例脐带脱垂。2组Bishop评分有显著改善(P <.001),1组使用PgE1(P =.01)和PgE2(P <.001)加强引产的比例显著更高。1组宫缩次数显著更低(P <.001),2组宫缩强度更高。两组间引产失败后剖宫产率无显著差异(P =.72)。基于主要结局指标,发现Dilapan-S不劣于Foley球囊。

结论

在足月妊娠引产术前宫颈成熟方面,Dilapan-S不劣于Foley球囊,因此在临床实践中可将Dilapan-S作为风险最小的替代方法推荐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe5a/11462052/aa2eb49e6b9d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验