Suppr超能文献

比较慢性淋巴细胞白血病一线治疗的疗效和安全性:一项网状Meta分析。

Comparing the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wen Tingyu, Sun Guangyi, Jiang Wenxin, Steiner Kat, Bridge Suzannah, Liu Peng

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.

Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Feb 1;117(2):322-334. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae245.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment strategies have transitioned from chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy to chemotherapy-free regimens. Frequentist network meta-analysis allows for direct and indirect comparisons between different treatments.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials assessing first-line treatments were included. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, undetectable minimal residual disease, objective response rate, and adverse events. Studies with comparable characteristics also underwent subgroup analysis, stratifying by age, comorbidities, IGHV status, and cytogenetic abnormalities.

RESULTS

A total of 30 eligible trials involved 12 818 patients, and 30 treatments were included. Acalabrutinib demonstrated a PFS advantage over ibrutinib and obinutuzumab-venetoclax in patients aged older than 65 years or with unmutated IGHV. In younger patients with comorbidities, acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab had superior PFS compared with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab, ibrutinib-venetoclax, and obinutuzumab-venetoclax. For older patients with comorbidities, acalabrutinib and acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab outperformed obinutuzumab-venetoclax without statistically difference between them. Minimal residual disease-guided ibrutinib-venetoclax surpassed obinutuzumab-venetoclax in patients without comorbidities. Ibrutinib-obinutuzumab exhibited extended PFS benefits compared with obinutuzumab-venetoclax in patients with mutated IGHV or with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations. Ibrutinib-venetoclax and ibrutinib-obinutuzumab had lower neutropenia rates than obinutuzumab-venetoclax. Ibrutinib-venetoclax had fewer infections than acalabrutinib and acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab. Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab caused less diarrhea than ibrutinib-venetoclax but more headaches than ibrutinib-obinutuzumab and obinutuzumab-venetoclax. Obinutuzumab-venetoclax had lower hypertension rates than ibrutinib-obinutuzumab. Ibrutinib-venetoclax had fewer arthralgia than acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab. For any grade secondary primary neoplasms, ibrutinib-venetoclax and obinutuzumab-venetoclax was less than acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab.

CONCLUSION

Tailored chemotherapy-free regimens can be selected based on age, comorbidities, IGHV status, and cytogenetic abnormalities to optimize treatment outcomes while considering different adverse events spectra.

摘要

背景

慢性淋巴细胞白血病的治疗策略已从化疗和化疗免疫疗法转变为无化疗方案。频率学派网络荟萃分析允许对不同治疗方法进行直接和间接比较。

方法

纳入评估一线治疗的随机对照试验。结局指标为无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期、不可检测的微小残留病、客观缓解率和不良事件。具有可比特征的研究也进行了亚组分析,按年龄、合并症、IGHV状态和细胞遗传学异常进行分层。

结果

共有30项符合条件的试验,涉及12818例患者,纳入了30种治疗方法。在65岁以上或IGHV未突变的患者中,阿卡替尼在PFS方面优于伊布替尼和奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉。在有合并症的年轻患者中,阿卡替尼-奥妥珠单抗的PFS优于伊布替尼-奥妥珠单抗、伊布替尼-维奈克拉和奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉。对于有合并症的老年患者,阿卡替尼和阿卡替尼-奥妥珠单抗的表现优于奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉,两者之间无统计学差异。在无合并症的患者中,微小残留病指导下的伊布替尼-维奈克拉优于奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉。在IGHV突变或有del(17p)和/或TP53突变的患者中,伊布替尼-奥妥珠单抗与奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉相比,PFS延长。伊布替尼-维奈克拉和伊布替尼-奥妥珠单抗的中性粒细胞减少率低于奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉。伊布替尼-维奈克拉的感染比阿卡替尼和阿卡替尼-奥妥珠单抗少。阿卡替尼-奥妥珠单抗引起的腹泻比伊布替尼-维奈克拉少,但头痛比伊布替尼-奥妥珠单抗和奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉多。奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉的高血压发生率低于伊布替尼-奥妥珠单抗。伊布替尼-维奈克拉的关节痛比阿卡替尼-奥妥珠单抗少。对于任何级别的继发性原发性肿瘤,伊布替尼-维奈克拉和奥妥珠单抗-维奈克拉比阿卡替尼-奥妥珠单抗少。

结论

可根据年龄、合并症、IGHV状态和细胞遗传学异常选择定制的无化疗方案,以优化治疗效果,同时考虑不同的不良事件谱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验