Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection before the age of two and child development.

BACKGROUND

To compare the differences in child development between children who contracted COVID-19 after February 1st, 2022, the period when the B.1.1.529 variant outbreak began to peak in Thailand, and those who did not.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in an outpatient pediatric clinic at a tertiary hospital in southern Thailand. COVID-19 was diagnosed based on the results of an FDA-approved antigen test or RT-PCR using a swab sample collected from the nasopharynx, nose, or throat. Child development was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3).

RESULTS

Of the 336 participants, 180 (53.6%) had a history of COVID-19. Almost all of them had mild COVID-19. The mean (SD) age at infection was 1.3 (0.3) years, and the median (IQR) duration between infection and ASQ-3 assessment was 193.5 (167.8, 216.2) days. The ASQ-3 scores at the ages of 18 (n = 166; 90 COVID-19 positive) and 24 months (n = 170; 90 COVID-19 positive) revealed no statistically significant differences between children with and without a history of COVID-19. Both groups had comparable proportions of developmental scores <1 SD below the mean.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild COVID-19 in young children did not increase the risk of developmental delays.

IMPACT

This cohort study was conducted during the Omicron pandemic. Of the 336 children, no clinical or statistically significant differences were observed in the scores of the Ages & Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition, at 18 or 24 months of age among the 180 participants with a history of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, at an average of 6 months post-infection, and those without. The findings suggest that mild SARS-CoV-2 infection before the age of 2 years is not associated with developmental delays. Strategies to prevent severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in young children, especially COVID-19 immunization, need to be highlighted.