Malik Adnan, Malik Muhammad Imran, Javaid Sadia, Qureshi Shahbaz, Nadir Abdul
Mountain Vista Medical Center, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Airedale general hospital, West Yorkshire, England.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Jan;49(1):54-62. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01648-7. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
Bariatric surgery is recommended for patients with unhealthy weight. Our study aim to compare and rank different bariatric surgical approaches in reducing weight parameters. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2023. We extracted all outcomes as mean change from the baseline. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval were used as a summary measure. All analysis was conducted with R version 4.2.2 (2022-10-31) and R Studio version 2022.07.2 (2009-2022) (RStudio, Inc.). Included surgeries were: Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD-RYGB), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Laparoscopic Gastric Plication (LGP), Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Sleeve (DJBS), Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB), Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Gastric plication, Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), and Intra-gastric balloon (IGB). Only clinical trials were included, with outcomes focused on weight parameters such as reductions in BMI (kg/m²), weight (kg), waist circumference (cm), fat mass (kg), and excess weight loss (EWL) (%). Our analysis of 67 studies showed that SADI-S was the best surgical technique in decreasing BMI (kg/m2) (MD = -18.06; 95% CI [-25.31; -10.81]) and DS follows in efficacy with a P-score (MD = -18.88; 95% CI [-31.15; -6.62]) however the pooled analysis was heterogeneous (I = 98.5%). For weight (kg), waist circumference (cm), and fat mass (kg), BPD-RYGB was the best surgical technique to reduce these parameters (MD = -41.48; 95% CI [-47.80, -35.51], MD = -29.08; 95% CI [-37.16, -21.00], and MD = -31.11; 95% CI [-38.77, -23.46]; respectively). The pooled analysis was heterogeneous except in fat mass (I = 0%, p-value = 0.8). Our network meta-analysis showed that the best surgical technique in increasing EWL (%) was RY-DS (MD = -61.27; % CI [-91.72; -30.82]) the next one in efficacy according to P-score was LVBG (MD = -59.03; % CI [-84.47; -33.59]). SADI-S is most effective in reducing BMI followed by RYGB. DS was associated with most estimated weight loss %.
对于体重不健康的患者,推荐进行减肥手术。我们的研究旨在比较并排序不同减肥手术方法在减轻体重参数方面的效果。我们检索了MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,检索时间从建库至2023年9月。我们提取了所有作为相对于基线的平均变化的结果。平均差值和95%置信区间用作汇总指标。所有分析均使用R版本4.2.2(2022-10-31)和R Studio版本2022.07.2(2009-2022)(RStudio公司)进行。纳入的手术包括:胆胰分流术(BPD-RYGB)、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)、腹腔镜胃折叠术(LGP)、十二指肠-空肠旁路袖状胃切除术(DJBS)、单吻合口胃旁路术(SAGB)、腹腔镜垂直束带胃成形术(LVBG)、袖状胃切除术(SG)、腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)、胃折叠术、胆胰分流术(BPD)和胃内球囊术(IGB)。仅纳入临床试验,结果聚焦于体重参数,如体重指数(kg/m²)、体重(kg)、腰围(cm)、脂肪量(kg)和超重减轻百分比(EWL)(%)。我们对67项研究的分析表明,SADI-S是降低体重指数(kg/m2)方面最佳的手术技术(MD = -18.06;95% CI [-25.31;-10.81]),胆胰分流十二指肠转位术(DS)的疗效次之,P值为(MD = -18.88;95% CI [-31.15;-6.62]),然而汇总分析具有异质性(I = 98.5%)。对于体重(kg)、腰围(cm)和脂肪量(kg),BPD-RYGB是降低这些参数的最佳手术技术(MD = -41.48;95% CI [-47.80, -35.51],MD = -29.08;95% CI [-37.16, -21.00],以及MD = -31.11;95% CI [-38.77, -23.46];分别)。除脂肪量外,汇总分析具有异质性(I = 0%,p值 = 0.8)。我们的网状Meta分析表明,增加EWL(%)方面最佳的手术技术是RY-DS(MD = -61.27;% CI [-91.72;-30.82]),根据P值疗效次之的是LVBG(MD = -59.03;% CI [-84.47;-33.59])。SADI-S在降低体重指数方面最有效,其次是RYGB。DS与最高的估计体重减轻百分比相关。