Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China.
Department of Oncology Intervention, National Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Front Immunol. 2024 Oct 1;15:1449663. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1449663. eCollection 2024.
Comparing the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab (TLT) with TACE combined with lenvatinib (TL) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly in determining which patients can benefit more from the TLT treatment.
From March 2021 to September 2023, a total of 169 patients from three centers were included in this study, with 103 patients receiving TLT and 66 patients receiving TL. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to evaluate the cumulative overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups and were assessed using the log-rank test. Subgroup analysis on tumor number, maximum tumor diameter, presence of portal vein thrombosis, AFP level, and Child-Pugh class were conducted.
The median OS was 26 months in the TLT group, and 20 months in the TL group. The median PFS was 14 months in the TLT group and 9 months in the TL group. The Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated a significantly superior OS and PFS in the TLT group compared to the TL group. Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with a maximum tumor diameter greater than 7 cm, AFP > 400 ng/ml and accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus, and Child-Pugh class A, there was a statistically significant difference in OS between TLT and TL groups.
OS and PFS were significantly improved in patients who received TLT compared to those who received TL, patients with a largest tumor diameter greater than 7 cm, AFP > 400 ng/ml, Child-Pugh class A and PVTT appeared to derive more benefit.
比较经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合仑伐替尼加替雷利珠单抗(TLT)与 TACE 联合仑伐替尼(TL)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效,特别是确定哪些患者可以从 TLT 治疗中获益更多。
本研究共纳入来自三个中心的 169 例患者,其中 103 例接受 TLT 治疗,66 例接受 TL 治疗。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法评估两组患者的累积总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS),采用对数秩检验进行比较。对肿瘤数量、最大肿瘤直径、门静脉血栓形成、AFP 水平和 Child-Pugh 分级进行亚组分析。
TLT 组的中位 OS 为 26 个月,TL 组为 20 个月。TLT 组的中位 PFS 为 14 个月,TL 组为 9 个月。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,TLT 组的 OS 和 PFS 明显优于 TL 组。亚组分析显示,对于最大肿瘤直径大于 7cm、AFP>400ng/ml 且伴有门静脉癌栓、Child-Pugh 分级为 A 的患者,TLT 组与 TL 组的 OS 存在统计学差异。
与 TL 相比,TLT 治疗可显著改善 OS 和 PFS,最大肿瘤直径大于 7cm、AFP>400ng/ml、Child-Pugh 分级为 A 和 PVTT 的患者似乎获益更多。