Suppr超能文献

重新评估二氧化硅(E 551)作为16周龄以下婴儿食品中的食品添加剂,并对其作为所有人群食品添加剂的重新评估进行跟踪。

Re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups.

作者信息

Younes Maged, Aquilina Gabriele, Castle Laurence, Degen Gisela, Engel Karl-Heinz, Fowler Paul, Frutos Fernandez Maria Jose, Fürst Peter, Gürtler Rainer, Husøy Trine, Manco Melania, Mennes Wim, Moldeus Peter, Passamonti Sabina, Shah Romina, Waalkens-Berendsen Ine, Wright Matthew, Andreoli Cristina, Bastos Maria, Benford Diane, Bignami Margherita, Bolognesi Claudia, Cheyns Karlien, Corsini Emanuela, Crebelli Riccardo, Dusemund Birgit, Fitzgerald Rex, Gaffet Eric, Loeschner Katrin, Marcon Francesca, Mast Jan, Mirat Manuela, Mortensen Alicja, Oomen Agnes, Schlatter Josef, Turck Dominique, Ulbrich Beate, Undas Anna, Vleminckx Christiane, Woelfle Detlef, Woutersen Ruud, Barmaz Stefania, Dino Borana, Gagliardi Gabriele, Levorato Sara, Mazzoli Elena, Nathanail Alexis, Rincon Ana Maria, Ruggeri Laura, Smeraldi Camilla, Tard Alexandra, Vermeiren Sam, Gundert-Remy Ursula

出版信息

EFSA J. 2024 Oct 17;22(10):e8880. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

The present opinion is the follow-up of the conclusions and recommendations of the Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive relevant to the safety assessment for all age groups. In addition, the risk assessment of silicon dioxide (E 551) for its use in food for infants below 16 weeks of age is performed. Based on the newly available information on the characterisation of the SAS used as E 551 and following the principles of the 2021 EFSA Guidance on Particle-TR, the conventional safety assessment has been complemented with nano-specific considerations. Given the uncertainties resulting from the limitations of the database and in the absence of genotoxicity concern, the Panel considered that it is not appropriate to derive an acceptable daily intake (ADI) but applied the margin of exposure (MOE) approach for the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that the MOE should be at least 36 for not raising a safety concern. The calculated MOEs considering the dietary exposure estimates for all population groups using the refined non-brand loyal scenario, estimated at the time of the 2018 re-evaluation, were all above 36. The Panel concluded that E 551 does not raise a safety concern in all population groups at the reported uses and use levels. The use of E 551 in food for infants below 16 weeks of age in FC 13.1.1 and FC 13.1.5.1 does not raise a safety concern at the current exposure levels. The Panel also concluded that the technical data provided support an amendment of the specifications for E 551 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The paucity of toxicological studies with proper dispersion protocol (with the exception of the genotoxicity studies) creates uncertainty in the present assessment of the potential toxicological effects related to the exposure to E 551 nanosize aggregates.

摘要

本意见是对二氧化硅(E 551)作为食品添加剂重新评估的科学意见中的结论和建议的后续跟进,该重新评估涉及所有年龄组的安全评估。此外,还对二氧化硅(E 551)用于16周龄以下婴儿食品进行了风险评估。基于关于用作E 551的硅胶特性的最新可用信息,并遵循2021年欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)关于颗粒毒性风险评估(Particle-TR)指南的原则,常规安全评估已补充了纳米特定考量因素。鉴于数据库局限性导致的不确定性,且不存在遗传毒性问题,专家小组认为得出每日可接受摄入量(ADI)不合适,而是采用暴露边际(MOE)方法进行风险评估。专家小组得出结论,为不引发安全担忧,MOE应至少为36。使用2018年重新评估时估算的细化非品牌忠诚情景计算的所有人群组膳食暴露估计值得出的MOE均高于36。专家小组得出结论,在报告的使用和使用水平下,E 551在所有人群组中均不引发安全担忧。在食品类别13.1.1和13.1.5.1中,E 551用于16周龄以下婴儿食品,在当前暴露水平下不会引发安全担忧。专家小组还得出结论,所提供的技术数据支持修订委员会条例(欧盟)No 231/2012中规定的E 551的规格。缺乏具有适当分散方案的毒理学研究(遗传毒性研究除外),在当前对与接触E 551纳米尺寸聚集体相关的潜在毒理学效应的评估中造成了不确定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74bf/11483555/c455acac277d/EFS2-22-e8880-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验