Chen Jane J, Sarkar Indra N, Hsu Emily, Dizon Don S
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Center for Biomedical Informatics of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jan;34(2):261-270. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0251. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Disparities in cervical cancer (CC) screening exist within racial/ethnic minority and immigrant groups. However, few studies have explored the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on screening, and the disparities that have been identified by existing studies remain incompletely explained. This study aims to identify the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on CC screening and elucidate the barriers contributing to identified disparities. A cross-sectional analysis of 25,660 U.S. women from the 2005, 2010, and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was done. The CC screening up-to-date status of cases was analyzed by race/ethnicity and immigrant status using logistic regression models. Conceptualized mediators were added to models to identify their contribution to identified disparities. All immigrants had lower screening odds than U.S.-born non-Hispanic White women with foreign-born non-Hispanic Asians having the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.49) followed by foreign-born non-Hispanic White (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76), Hispanic/Latinx (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99). Adjusting for only socioeconomic status or access to care attenuated the aOR: for foreign-born Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women only. Adjusting simultaneously for language and acculturation attenuated the aOR: for all immigrants. Disparities in CC screening were only found in the immigrant populations of various racial/ethnic groups. Targeting insurance and health care access may address disparities in immigrant Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women. Focusing on culturally and linguistically competent care and education may be more crucial for immigrant non-Hispanic Asian and White women.
宫颈癌(CC)筛查在少数族裔和移民群体中存在差异。然而,很少有研究探讨种族/族裔和移民身份对筛查的共同影响,而且现有研究所发现的差异仍未得到充分解释。本研究旨在确定种族/族裔和移民身份对CC筛查的共同影响,并阐明导致已发现差异的障碍。对2005年、2010年和2015年美国国家健康访谈调查中的25660名美国女性进行了横断面分析。使用逻辑回归模型按种族/族裔和移民身份分析病例的CC筛查最新状态。将概念化的中介因素添加到模型中,以确定它们对已发现差异的贡献。所有移民的筛查几率均低于美国出生的非西班牙裔白人女性,其中外国出生的非西班牙裔亚洲人几率最低(调整后的优势比[aOR]:0.36,95%置信区间[CI]:0.26 - 0.49),其次是外国出生的非西班牙裔白人(aOR:0.52,95% CI:0.36 - 0.76)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔(aOR:0.58,95% CI:0.47 - 0.73)和非西班牙裔黑人女性(aOR:0.62,95% CI:0.38 - 0.99)。仅调整社会经济地位或获得医疗服务的机会会使aOR降低:仅针对外国出生的西班牙裔/拉丁裔和非西班牙裔黑人女性。同时调整语言和文化适应会使aOR降低:针对所有移民。CC筛查差异仅在不同种族/族裔群体的移民人群中发现。针对保险和医疗服务可及性可能解决移民西班牙裔/拉丁裔和非西班牙裔黑人女性的差异问题。关注文化和语言能力适配的医疗服务与教育对移民非西班牙裔亚洲人和白人女性可能更为关键。