Suppr超能文献

信息提供者特征影响基于临床痴呆评定量表总分的阿尔茨海默病分期。

Informant characteristics influence Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores-based staging of Alzheimer's disease.

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Women Brain Foundation, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nat Aging. 2024 Nov;4(11):1538-1543. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00732-x. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

Abstract

The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is a staging scale for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is commonly used as an outcome in clinical trials. It relies on information provided by the patient and an informant. The CDR-SB should reflect only the patient's disease severity. However, we explored whether informant characteristics were associated with CDR-SB scores because that association might introduce bias in Alzheimer's disease research. We found that the CDR-SB was 0.20 higher when informants were female, 0.39 higher when the informant was a patient's child and 0.18 lower if the relationship was other than spouse or children. Regarding the frequency of contact, CDR-SB scores were 0.38 higher when contact was at least once a week, 0.65 higher when daily and 0.57 higher when living with the patient. Our analysis results suggest that informant characteristics can modify the CDR-SB scores and might introduce bias into Alzheimer's disease trials and research.

摘要

临床痴呆评定量表总和分(CDR-SB)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的分期量表,常用于临床试验的结局指标。它依赖于患者和知情者提供的信息。CDR-SB 应仅反映患者的疾病严重程度。然而,我们探讨了知情者特征是否与 CDR-SB 评分相关,因为这种关联可能会给阿尔茨海默病研究带来偏倚。我们发现,当知情者为女性时,CDR-SB 评分会高 0.20 分;当知情者是患者的子女时,CDR-SB 评分会高 0.39 分;而当关系不是配偶或子女时,CDR-SB 评分会低 0.18 分。关于接触频率,当每周至少接触一次时,CDR-SB 评分会高 0.38 分;当每天接触时,CDR-SB 评分会高 0.65 分;当与患者同住时,CDR-SB 评分会高 0.57 分。我们的分析结果表明,知情者特征可以改变 CDR-SB 评分,并可能给阿尔茨海默病试验和研究带来偏倚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验