Ezzedine Khaled, Soliman Ahmed M, Camp Heidi S, Ladd Mary Kate, Pokrzywinski Robin, Coyne Karin S, Sen Rohini, Schlosser Bethanee J, Bae Jung Min, Hamzavi Iltefat
Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.
Équipe d'Accueil 7379 EpidermE (Epidemiology in Dermatology and Therapeutics Evaluation), Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Jan 1;161(1):39-46. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4534.
Defining meaningful improvement using the Total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) and the Facial VASI (F-VASI) aids interpretation of findings from clinical trials evaluating vitiligo treatments; however, clear and clinically meaningful thresholds have not yet been established.
To assess concept validity and measurement performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo and to identify meaningful change thresholds.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods study consisted of a secondary analysis of a phase 2 multicenter double-blind dose-ranging randomized clinical trial and embedded qualitative interviews conducted at 35 sites in Canada, France, Japan, and the US. The secondary analysis included the trial's adult patients with nonsegmental vitiligo (T-VASI ≥5 and F-VASI ≥0.5 at baseline). Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful change were evaluated using clinician- and patient-reported information. The trial's embedded interviews were used to qualitatively assess content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Data analyses were performed from March to July 2023.
Participants were randomized to 6-, 11-, or 22-mg/day upadacitinib or placebo for 24 weeks.
Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful changed plus content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Measurement instruments included the T-VASI, F-VASI, Vitiligo Noticeability Scale, Total-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Face-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Total-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-T), Face-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-F), Patient's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo, Physician's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V), Vitiligo Quality-of-Life Instrument, Dermatology Life Quality Index, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and transcribed verbatim interviews with patients.
The psychometric analysis included 164 participants (mean [SD] age, 46 years; 103 [63%] females) and the qualitative analysis included 14 participants (mean [SD] age, 48.8 [12.2] years; 9 females [64%] and 5 males [36%]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.98 for T-VASI and 0.99 for F-VASI in patients with clinically stable vitiligo between baseline and week 4, supporting test-retest reliability. At baseline and week 24, correlations were moderate to strong between T-VASI and PhGVA-T (r = 0.63-0.65) and between F-VASI and PhGVA-F (r = 0.65-0.71). Average baseline and week-24 VASI scores decreased with repigmentation (ie, increasing PhGVA scores). Least-square mean VASI scores increased with greater repigmentation as measured by the PhGIC-V. Least-square mean VASI scores also differed between patients with improved PhGIC-V and those with no change or worsened V-PhGIC scores. Using a multiple anchor approach, improvements of 30% in T-VASI and 50% in F-VASI scores reflected meaningful repigmentation between baseline and week 24.
This mixed-methods study found that the T-VASI and F-VASI are reliable, valid, able to differentiate between clinically distinct groups, and responsive in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo. The thresholds for meaningful change were lower than those historically used in clinical trials, suggesting that T-VASI 50 and F-VASI 75 are conservative estimates and reflect improvements that would be meaningful in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04927975.
使用白癜风总面积评分指数(T-VASI)和面部VASI(F-VASI)来定义有意义的改善有助于解释评估白癜风治疗的临床试验结果;然而,尚未建立明确且具有临床意义的阈值。
评估T-VASI和F-VASI在非节段性白癜风患者中的概念效度和测量性能,并确定有意义的变化阈值。
设计、地点和参与者:这项混合方法研究包括对一项2期多中心双盲剂量范围随机临床试验的二次分析以及在加拿大、法国、日本和美国的35个地点进行的嵌入式定性访谈。二次分析纳入了该试验中基线时T-VASI≥5且F-VASI≥0.5的成年非节段性白癜风患者。使用临床医生和患者报告的信息评估T-VASI和F-VASI的心理测量性能以及有意义变化的阈值。该试验的嵌入式访谈用于定性评估内容效度和患者对有意义色素再生的看法。数据分析于2023年3月至7月进行。
参与者被随机分配至每天6毫克、11毫克或22毫克的乌帕替尼或安慰剂组,为期24周。
T-VASI和F-VASI的心理测量性能、有意义变化的阈值、内容效度以及患者对有意义色素再生的看法。测量工具包括T-VASI、F-VASI、白癜风可见度量表、患者整体白癜风评估、面部患者整体白癜风评估、医生整体白癜风评估(总评,PhGVA-T)、面部医生整体白癜风评估(PhGVA-F)、患者白癜风变化整体印象、医生白癜风变化整体印象(PhGIC-V)、白癜风生活质量量表、皮肤病生活质量指数、医院焦虑抑郁量表以及对患者的逐字访谈记录。
心理测量分析纳入了164名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄46岁;103名[63%]为女性),定性分析纳入了14名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄48.8[12.2]岁;9名女性[64%]和5名男性[36%])。在基线和第4周临床稳定的白癜风患者中,T-VASI的组内相关系数为0.98,F-VASI为0.99,支持重测信度。在基线和第24周时,T-VASI与PhGVA-T之间(r = 0.63 - 0.65)以及F-VASI与PhGVA-F之间(r = 0.65 - 0.71)的相关性为中度至高度。随着色素再生(即PhGVA评分增加),平均基线和第24周的VASI评分降低。根据PhGIC-V测量,随着色素再生程度增加,最小二乘均值VASI评分升高。PhGIC-V改善的患者与V-PhGIC评分无变化或恶化的患者之间,最小二乘均值VASI评分也存在差异。采用多锚定方法,T-VASI评分提高30%和F-VASI评分提高50%反映了基线至第24周之间有意义的色素再生。
这项混合方法研究发现,T-VASI和F-VASI可靠、有效,能够区分临床不同组,并且对非节段性白癜风患者有反应。有意义变化的阈值低于以往临床试验中使用的阈值,这表明T-VASI 50和F-VASI 75是保守估计,反映了对非节段性白癜风患者有意义的改善。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04927975。