Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Division of Computational Pathology, Indiana University, Indianopolis, IN, USA; Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianopolis, IN, USA; Department of Computer Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Division for Computational Radiology and Clinical AI, Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Division for Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Nov;25(11):e589-e601. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00315-2.
Technological advancements have enabled the extended investigation, development, and application of computational approaches in various domains, including health care. A burgeoning number of diagnostic, predictive, prognostic, and monitoring biomarkers are continuously being explored to improve clinical decision making in neuro-oncology. These advancements describe the increasing incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, including the use of radiomics. However, the broad applicability and clinical translation of AI are restricted by concerns about generalisability, reproducibility, scalability, and validation. This Policy Review intends to serve as the leading resource of recommendations for the standardisation and good clinical practice of AI approaches in health care, particularly in neuro-oncology. To this end, we investigate the repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of AI in response assessment in neuro-oncology in studies on factors affecting such computational approaches, and in publicly available open-source data and computational software tools facilitating these goals. The pathway for standardisation and validation of these approaches is discussed with the view of trustworthy AI enabling the next generation of clinical trials. We conclude with an outlook on the future of AI-enabled neuro-oncology.
技术进步使计算方法在包括医疗保健在内的各个领域的扩展研究、开发和应用成为可能。越来越多的诊断、预测、预后和监测生物标志物正在被探索,以改善神经肿瘤学的临床决策。这些进展描述了人工智能 (AI) 算法的广泛应用,包括放射组学的使用。然而,AI 的广泛适用性和临床转化受到对通用性、可重复性、可扩展性和验证的担忧的限制。本政策审查旨在成为医疗保健中 AI 方法的标准化和良好临床实践的主要建议资源,特别是在神经肿瘤学领域。为此,我们研究了影响这些计算方法的因素的研究中,以及在公开的开源数据和计算软件工具中,AI 在神经肿瘤学中的反应评估中的可重复性、可重复性和稳定性。讨论了这些方法的标准化和验证途径,以期实现值得信赖的 AI,为下一代临床试验奠定基础。最后,我们展望了人工智能在神经肿瘤学中的未来。