Suppr超能文献

肠道微生物群靶向治疗作为炎症性肠病的辅助治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Gut microbiome-targeted therapies as adjuvant treatments in inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Tao, Li Xiaoang, Li Jun, Sun Feng, Duan Liping

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

China Center for Evidence Based Medical and Clinical Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jan;40(1):78-88. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16795. Epub 2024 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gut microbiome-targeted therapies (MTTs), including prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), have been widely used in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), but the best MTTs has not yet been confirmed. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine this in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of MTTs as adjuvant therapies for IBD until December 10, 2023. Data were pooled using a random effects model, with efficacy reported as pooled relative risks with 95% CIs, and interventions ranked according to means of surfaces under cumulative ranking values.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Firstly, we compared the efficacy of MTTs in IBD patients. Only FMT and probiotics were superior to placebo in all outcomes, but FMT ranked best in improving clinical response rate and clinical and endoscopic remission rate, and probiotics ranked second in reducing clinical relapse rate showed significant efficacy, while prebiotics ranked first showed nonsignificant efficacy. Subsequently, we conducted NMA for specific MTT formulations in UC and CD separately, which revealed that FMT, especially combined FMT via colonoscopy and enema, showed significant efficacy and was superior in improving clinical response and remission rate of active UC patients. As for endoscopic remission and clinical relapse, multistrain probiotics based on specific genera of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium showed significant efficacy and ranked best in UC. In CD, we found that no MTTs were significantly better than placebo, but synbiotics comprising Bifidobacterium and fructo-oligosaccharide/inulin mix and Saccharomyces ranked best in improving clinical remission and reducing clinical relapse, respectively. Moreover, FMT was safe in both UC and CD.

CONCLUSIONS

FMT and multistrain probiotics showed superior efficacy in UC. However, the efficacy of MTTs varies among different IBD subtypes and disease stages; thus, the personalized treatment strategies of MTTs are necessary.

摘要

背景与目的

针对肠道微生物群的疗法(MTT),包括益生元、益生菌、合生元和粪便微生物群移植(FMT),已广泛应用于炎症性肠病(IBD),但最佳的MTT尚未得到证实。我们进行了一项网状Meta分析(NMA),以在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)中对此进行研究。

方法

我们检索了截至2023年12月10日关于MTT作为IBD辅助疗法的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)。数据采用随机效应模型进行汇总,疗效以汇总相对风险及95%置信区间报告,干预措施根据累积排名值下的曲面均值进行排序。

结果

38项RCT符合纳入标准。首先,我们比较了MTT在IBD患者中的疗效。只有FMT和益生菌在所有结局方面均优于安慰剂,但FMT在提高临床缓解率以及临床和内镜缓解率方面排名最佳,益生菌在降低临床复发率方面排名第二显示出显著疗效,而益生元排名第一显示疗效不显著。随后,我们分别对UC和CD中的特定MTT制剂进行了NMA,结果显示FMT,尤其是通过结肠镜检查和灌肠联合的FMT,显示出显著疗效,在改善活动期UC患者的临床缓解和缓解率方面更具优势。至于内镜缓解和临床复发,基于特定属的乳酸杆菌和双歧杆菌的多菌株益生菌显示出显著疗效,在UC中排名最佳。在CD中,我们发现没有MTT显著优于安慰剂,但包含双歧杆菌和低聚果糖/菊粉混合物以及酿酒酵母的合生元分别在改善临床缓解和降低临床复发方面排名最佳。此外,FMT在UC和CD中均安全。

结论

FMT和多菌株益生菌在UC中显示出卓越疗效。然而,MTT的疗效在不同的IBD亚型和疾病阶段有所不同;因此,MTT的个性化治疗策略是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验