Urraro Fabrizio, Piscopo Marco, Giordano Nicoletta, Russo Gaetano Maria, Gallo Luigi, Magliocchetti Simona, Giordano Diego Sandro, Patanè Vittorio, Arcaniolo Davide, Cozzolino Immacolata, Nardone Valerio, Cappabianca Salvatore, Reginelli Alfonso
Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 29;13(21):6478. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216478.
: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in characterizing small renal masses (SRMs) measuring less than 3 cm and in distinguishing between malignant and benign SRMs. : A retrospective study was conducted between January 2022 and January 2023 at the Radiology Department of (Anonymized data), with a total of 43 patients assessed via CT and MRI scans, which were subsequently studied by experienced radiologists who were blinded to the pathology results. The CEUS findings were then compared with histopathological examination outcomes or follow-up imaging results. : The study results revealed a notably high level of diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity at 0.875, specificity at 0.94, positive predictive value at 0.95, and negative predictive value at 0.86 for characterizing SRMs. Spearman rank correlation analysis substantiated a robust positive linear correlation between the CEUS findings and biopsy results (r = 0.972). : These findings underscore the potential utility of CEUS as a valuable tool for discriminating between malignant and benign SRMs, carrying significant implications for clinical decision-making and leading to improved patient outcomes. However, larger validation studies are imperative to establish its role in routine clinical practice and to address potential limitations.
本研究的目的是评估超声造影(CEUS)在鉴别直径小于3cm的小肾肿块(SRM)以及区分恶性和良性SRM方面的诊断性能。
2022年1月至2023年1月期间,在(匿名数据)放射科进行了一项回顾性研究,共有43例患者接受了CT和MRI扫描评估,随后由对病理结果不知情的经验丰富的放射科医生进行研究。然后将CEUS检查结果与组织病理学检查结果或随访影像结果进行比较。
研究结果显示诊断准确性极高,在鉴别SRM方面,敏感性为0.875,特异性为0.94,阳性预测值为0.95,阴性预测值为0.86。Spearman等级相关分析证实CEUS检查结果与活检结果之间存在强正线性相关(r = 0.972)。
这些发现强调了CEUS作为鉴别恶性和良性SRM的有价值工具的潜在效用,对临床决策具有重要意义,并能改善患者预后。然而,需要更大规模的验证研究来确定其在常规临床实践中的作用并解决潜在的局限性。