The peritumoral edema index and related mechanisms influence the prognosis of GBM patients.

BACKGROUND

Peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) represents a characteristic phenotype of intracranial gliomas. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognosis and mechanism of PTBE. In this study, clinical imaging data, along with publicly available imaging data, were utilized to assess the prognosis of PTBE in glioblastoma (GBM) patients, and the associated mechanisms were preliminarily analyzed.

METHODS

We investigated relevant imaging features, including edema, in GBM patients using ITK-SNAP imaging segmentation software. Risk factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. In addition, the impact of PTBE on PFS and OS was analyzed in clinical GBM patients using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis method, and the results further validated by combining data from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Finally, functional enrichment analysis based on TCIA and TCGA datasets identified several pathways potentially involved in the mechanism of edema formation.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 32 clinical GBM patients and 132 GBM patients from public databases. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that age and edema index (EI) are independent risk factors for PFS, but not for OS. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed consistent survival analysis results between IE groups among both clinical patients and TCIA and TCGA patients, suggesting a significant effect of PTBE on PFS but not on OS. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis predicted the involvement of several pathways related mainly to cellular bioenergetics and vasculogenic processes in the mechanism of PTBE formation. While these novel results warrant confirmation in a larger patient cohort, they support good prognostic value for PTBE assessment in GBM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that a low EI positively impacts disease control in GBM patients, but this does not entirely translate into an improvement in OS. Multiple genes, signaling pathways, and biological processes may contribute to the formation of peritumoral edema in GBM through cytotoxic and vascular mechanisms.