Evans Azia, Doshi Riddhi, Yeaw Jason, Coyle Katharine, Goldberg Steven, Wang Elizabeth, Fragala Maren S, Reddy Jairus
HealthTrackRx, Denton, TX 76207, USA.
IQVIA, Durham, NC 27703, USA.
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Jan;14(1):e240173. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0173. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
Vaginitis and other vaginal discharge syndromes lead to high healthcare utilization. Molecular tests like syndromic multiplex real-time (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based tests are highly sensitive and specific at diagnosing the infectious causes of vaginitis. This study compared the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct all-cause healthcare costs among patients with vaginitis in the US receiving next-day syndromic multiplex RT-PCR tests with those receiving other PCR tests or no diagnostic test of interest. This retrospective study utilized claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database to identify adult patients with a diagnosis for vaginitis (first claim = index) from January 2021 to April 2023, with 6 months of continuous enrollment prior to (baseline) and after index (follow-up). Pairwise comparisons were conducted between RT-PCR and 1:1 propensity matched Other PCR and No Test subcohorts for all-cause HCRU and costs during follow-up. Each of the RT-PCR, Other PCR and No Test subcohorts included 1946 matched patients. Mean(SD) follow-up total cost was significantly lower for the RT-PCR than the No Test subcohort ($5607 [$15,122] vs $6680 [$20,751], p = 0.0023). Mean(SD) overall outpatient and other medical service costs were lower for RT-PCR versus Other PCR (outpatient: $2964 [$9666] vs $3174 [$7113], p = 0.0110; other medical: $1961 [$9244] vs $2099 [$6475], p = 0.0002) and No Test subcohorts (outpatient: $2964 [$9666] vs $4067 [$12,341], p < 0.0001; other medical: $1961 [$9244] vs $2973 [$11,685]; p < 0.0001). A lower proportion had any outpatient service HCRU in RT-PCR versus Other PCR subcohort (92.6% vs 94.2%, p = 0.0349). A lower proportion had any other medical service claim in RT-PCR versus Other PCR (78.3% vs 83.2%, p < 0.0001) and No Test subcohorts (78.3% vs 83.0%, p = 0.0001). Physician office, emergency room (ER), prescription use and costs were similar between the subcohorts. The use of syndromic multiplex RT-PCR diagnostics with next day test results in patients with vaginitis was associated with lower outpatient costs and total healthcare costs than those in the no test cohort over 6 months. These findings indicate that use of syndromic multiplex RT-PCR diagnostics may contribute to improved patient management compared with clinical diagnosis alone.
阴道炎和其他阴道分泌物综合征导致大量医疗资源的使用。像基于综合征多重实时(RT)聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测这样的分子检测在诊断阴道炎的感染原因方面具有高度敏感性和特异性。本研究比较了美国接受次日综合征多重RT-PCR检测的阴道炎患者与接受其他PCR检测或未进行相关诊断检测的患者之间的医疗资源利用(HCRU)和直接全因医疗成本。这项回顾性研究利用IQVIA PharMetrics Plus数据库中的索赔数据,确定2021年1月至2023年4月期间诊断为阴道炎(首次索赔 = 索引)的成年患者,在索引之前(基线)和之后(随访)连续登记6个月。在随访期间,对RT-PCR与1:1倾向匹配的其他PCR和无检测亚组进行全因HCRU和成本的成对比较。RT-PCR、其他PCR和无检测亚组各包括1946名匹配患者。RT-PCR组的平均(标准差)随访总成本显著低于无检测亚组(5607美元[15122美元]对6680美元[20751美元],p = 0.0023)。RT-PCR组的平均(标准差)总体门诊和其他医疗服务成本低于其他PCR组(门诊:2964美元[9666美元]对3174美元[7113美元],p = 0.0110;其他医疗:1961美元[9244美元]对2099美元[6475美元],p = 0.0002)和无检测亚组(门诊:2964美元[9666美元]对4067美元[12341美元],p < 0.0001;其他医疗:1961美元[9244美元]对2973美元[11685美元];p < 0.0001)。RT-PCR组中有任何门诊服务HCRU的比例低于其他PCR亚组(92.6%对94.2%,p = 0.0349)。RT-PCR组中有任何其他医疗服务索赔的比例低于其他PCR组(78.3%对83.2%,p < 0.0001)和无检测亚组(78.3%对83.0%,p = 0.0001)。亚组之间的医师办公室、急诊室(ER)、处方使用和成本相似。与无检测队列相比,对阴道炎患者使用次日即可获得检测结果的综合征多重RT-PCR诊断与较低的门诊成本和总医疗成本相关。这些发现表明,与单独的临床诊断相比,使用综合征多重RT-PCR诊断可能有助于改善患者管理。