Queiroz Ivo, Pimentel Túlio, Gallo Ruelas Mariano, Tavares Arthur Henrique, Barbosa Lucas M, Defante Maria L R, Leandro Giovanna N, Monteiro Arthur Ribeiro, Pimentel Fernando Nunes
Department of Medicine, Medicine Department, Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Department of Medicine, Medicine Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Jan;33(1):135-144. doi: 10.1007/s10787-024-01604-x. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disorder causing pain and stiffness, with limited effective treatment options. Methotrexate, known for its anti-inflammatory properties in rheumatoid arthritis, is being explored as a treatment for OA. This study evaluates Methotrexate's efficacy compared to placebo in reducing OA symptoms, such as stiffness in the knee and hand, and its impact on pain, physical function.
We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), analyzing the efficacy of Methotrexate compared to placebo in patients with OA. We pooled risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes. For continuous outcomes, we used standard mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes included were related to knee and hand pain, knee stiffness, and similar outcomes. We used R version 4.4.1 for statistical analyses. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach evaluated the quality of evidence.
This analysis included 5 RCTs comprising 465 patients, of whom 229 were randomized to Methotrexate. The age ranged from 52.4 to 67.5 years among studies. Compared with placebo, Methotrexate significantly reduced knee and hand stiffness at the end of follow-up (SMD - 0.36; 95% CI - 0.57 to - 0.15; p< 0.01), knee and hand stiffness at 6 months of follow-up (SMD - 0.48; 95% CI - 0.70 to - 0.27; p< 0.01).
Methotrexate significantly reduced knee stiffness in both knee and hand OA. However, current literature might be underpowered, more robust RCTs are necessary to validate these findings.
骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见的关节疾病,会导致疼痛和僵硬,有效的治疗选择有限。甲氨蝶呤以其在类风湿关节炎中的抗炎特性而闻名,目前正在探索将其作为OA的一种治疗方法。本研究评估了甲氨蝶呤与安慰剂相比在减轻OA症状(如膝盖和手部僵硬)方面的疗效,及其对疼痛、身体功能的影响。
我们系统检索了PubMed、谷歌学术、Embase、科学网和考克兰数据库中的随机对照试验(RCT),分析甲氨蝶呤与安慰剂相比在OA患者中的疗效。我们汇总了二元结局的风险比(RR)。对于连续结局,我们使用标准平均差(SMD)和平均差(MD)以及95%置信区间(CI)。纳入的结局包括与膝盖和手部疼痛、膝盖僵硬以及类似结局相关的内容。我们使用R 4.4.1版本进行统计分析。推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估了证据质量。
该分析纳入了5项RCT,共465例患者,其中229例被随机分配至甲氨蝶呤组。各研究中的年龄范围为52.4至67.5岁。与安慰剂相比,甲氨蝶呤在随访结束时显著降低了膝盖和手部的僵硬程度(SMD -0.36;95% CI -0.57至-0.15;p<0.01),在随访6个月时也显著降低了膝盖和手部的僵硬程度(SMD -0.48;95% CI -0.70至-0.27;p<0.01)。
甲氨蝶呤显著降低了膝关节和手部OA患者的膝盖僵硬程度。然而,目前的文献可能样本量不足,需要更有力的RCT来验证这些发现。