BEST unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
University of Oxford Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 29;11(1):e001541. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001541.
The evolving landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) necessitates refining colonoscopic surveillance guidelines. This study outlines methodology adopted by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Guideline Development Group (GDG) for updating IBD colorectal surveillance guidelines.
The 'Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) approach, as outlined in the GRADE handbook, was employed. Thematic questions were formulated using either the 'patient, intervention, comparison and outcome' format or the 'current state of knowledge, area of interest, potential impact and suggestions from experts in the field' format. The evidence review process included systematic reviews assessed using appropriate appraisal tools. An extensive list of potential outcomes was compiled from literature and expert consultations and then ranked by GDG members. The top outcomes were identified for evidence synthesis in three key areas: utility of surveillance in IBD, quality of bowel preparation and use of advanced imaging techniques in colonoscopy for IBD. Risk thresholding exercises determined specific risk levels for different surveillance strategies and intervals. This approach enabled the GDG to establish precise thresholds for interventions based on relative and absolute risk assessments, directly informing the stratification of surveillance recommendations. Significance of effect sizes (small, moderate, large) will guide the final GRADE assessment of the evidence.
Ethics approval is not applicable. By integrating clinical expertise, patient experiences and innovative methodologies like risk thresholding, we aim to deliver actionable recommendations for IBD colorectal surveillance. This protocol, complementing the main guidelines, offers GDGs, clinical trialists and practitioners a framework to inform future research and enhance patient care and outcomes.
炎症性肠病(IBD)领域不断发展,需要对结肠镜检查监测指南进行修订。本研究概述了英国胃肠病学会(BSG)指南制定小组(GDG)采用的方法,用于更新 IBD 结直肠监测指南。
采用《推荐分级的评估、制定与评价》(GRADE)手册中概述的 GRADE 方法。使用“患者、干预、比较和结局”格式或“当前知识状态、关注领域、潜在影响和该领域专家建议”格式制定主题问题。证据审查过程包括使用适当评估工具评估的系统评价。从文献和专家咨询中汇编了一份潜在结局清单,然后由 GDG 成员进行排名。在三个关键领域中,对证据进行综合分析的主要结局是:IBD 监测的实用性、肠道准备质量以及 IBD 结肠镜检查中使用先进成像技术。风险阈值练习确定了不同监测策略和间隔的特定风险水平。这种方法使 GDG 能够根据相对和绝对风险评估为干预措施确定精确的阈值,直接为监测建议的分层提供信息。效果大小(小、中、大)的显著性将指导证据的最终 GRADE 评估。
不需要伦理批准。通过整合临床专业知识、患者体验和创新方法,如风险阈值,我们旨在为 IBD 结直肠监测提供可行的建议。该方案补充了主要指南,为 GDG、临床试验人员和从业者提供了一个框架,以指导未来的研究并改善患者的护理和结局。