Suppr超能文献

在赞比亚迈向全民健康覆盖的道路上,确定疟疾患者的家庭自付费用、灾难性支出发生率和贫困情况。

Determining household out of pocket payments, incidence of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment among patients with malaria in Zambia's path towards Universal Health Coverage.

作者信息

Banda Patrick, Masiye Felix, Kaonga Oliver, Bump Jesse, Berman Peter

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.

Department of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0312906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312906. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that about 3.2 billion people which is nearly half of the world's population are at risk of malaria. Annually about 216 million cases and 445,000 deaths of malaria occur globally. Africa accounted for 90% and 91% of the malaria cases and deaths respectively. Zambia has earmarked malaria elimination on its path to Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This paper aims to determine the incidence of Out-of-Pocket Payments (OOP) and Catastrophic Health Expenditures (CHE) and impoverishment among households with malaria patients in Zambia. The paper focusses on the incidence of OOP and impoverishment for malaria in a setting without user fees for accessing primary malaria health care services and virtually no user fees at all levels of care if referred through the referral system. The results of this study will also serve as a baseline for tracking Zambia's path towards achieving malaria financial access on its path towards UHC among patient with malaria.

METHODS

The study uses a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of households in both rural and urban areas of Zambia. The study employed probability sampling procedures. A two-stage stratified cluster sample design was used. We analyse a total of 2,005 households that had at least one member suffering from malaria with a recall period of four weeks for out-patients and six months for the in-patient respectively. A logistic regression model was estimated with a Categorical Dependent variable being CHE (CHE = = 1, or otherwise = = 0). A household is considered impoverished if it fell below the poverty line due to OOP. All data was analyzed using Stata version 2013.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results show that although the country has a free malaria policy at primary care level and virtually at all levels if referred through the health system process, households are still incurring costs in accessing health care services. Incidence of CHE and impoverishment were reflected at all levels. In terms of CHE, the poorest contributed almost 30% while the wealthier quintile contributed about 10%. Similarly, impoverishment effects of OOPs are more pronounced in the poorest quintile. The OOP composed mainly of transport, followed by diagnosis and medicines and was lowest for Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) payments. The high costs of transport that the households had to incur when accessing health services could be due to the long distance that the households have to face as they travel to the health facilities as most of the facilities in Zambia are still outside the 5 km radius. The drug expenditure could be explained by the drugs running out of stock. Low expenditure on ITNs could be due to the country's strategy of mass distribution working to give the country's universal financial protection on ITNs for malaria.

CONCLUSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

This study sought to address gaps in OOP and the associated incidence of CHE and impoverishment for malaria, distribution of OOP among Social Economic Status (SES) setting and determinants of OOP in Country that has earmarked malaria elimination in the UHC agenda. Understanding household's costs related to malaria will enable targeting intervention to accelerate Zambia's path towards elimination of malaria and therefore contribute to attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals of household's financial access to UHC. Thus, the study will also serve as a baseline for tracking UHC for household financial access to malaria care that the country has embarked on.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)估计,约32亿人,即全球近一半人口,面临疟疾风险。全球每年约有2.16亿疟疾病例,44.5万人死于疟疾。非洲分别占疟疾病例和死亡人数的90%和91%。赞比亚已将消除疟疾纳入其全民健康覆盖(UHC)的进程。本文旨在确定赞比亚疟疾患者家庭的自付费用(OOP)、灾难性卫生支出(CHE)发生率以及贫困情况。本文重点关注在初级疟疾保健服务无需支付费用且通过转诊系统在各级医疗几乎都无需支付费用的情况下,疟疾的自付费用和贫困发生率。本研究结果还将作为追踪赞比亚在疟疾患者中实现全民健康覆盖进程中疟疾财务可及性路径的基线。

方法

该研究采用了对赞比亚农村和城市地区家庭进行的具有全国代表性的横断面调查。研究采用概率抽样程序。使用了两阶段分层整群抽样设计。我们分析了总共2005户家庭,这些家庭中至少有一名成员患有疟疾,门诊患者的回忆期为四周,住院患者的回忆期为六个月。估计了一个逻辑回归模型,分类因变量为CHE(CHE == 1,否则 == 0)。如果一个家庭因自付费用而低于贫困线,则被视为贫困家庭。所有数据均使用2013版Stata进行分析。

结果与讨论

结果表明,尽管该国在初级保健层面有免费疟疾政策,并且通过卫生系统转诊在几乎所有层面实际上都是免费的,但家庭在获取医疗服务时仍需承担费用。各级都反映出CHE和贫困发生率。就CHE而言,最贫困的人群贡献了近30%,而最富有的五分之一人群贡献了约10%。同样,自付费用对贫困的影响在最贫困的五分之一人群中更为明显。自付费用主要由交通费用构成,其次是诊断和药品费用,用于经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)的支付费用最低。家庭在获取医疗服务时不得不承担高额交通费用,可能是因为赞比亚的大多数医疗机构仍在5公里半径范围之外,家庭前往医疗机构时要面临较长的距离。药品支出可能是由于药品缺货。ITN支出较低可能是因为该国的大规模分发战略为疟疾的ITN提供了全民财务保护。

结论与政策启示

本研究旨在解决自付费用方面的差距以及与之相关的疟疾CHE和贫困发生率、自付费用在社会经济地位(SES)背景下的分布情况以及在全民健康覆盖议程中已将消除疟疾作为目标的国家中自付费用的决定因素。了解家庭与疟疾相关的费用将有助于有针对性地进行干预,以加速赞比亚消除疟疾的进程,从而有助于实现家庭财务可及全民健康覆盖这一可持续发展目标。因此,该研究还将作为追踪该国已着手进行的家庭获取疟疾护理的全民健康覆盖情况的基线。

相似文献

6
Does User Fee Removal Policy Provide Financial Protection from Catastrophic Health Care Payments? Evidence from Zambia.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 21;11(1):e0146508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146508. eCollection 2016.
8
Inequalities in financial risk protection in Bangladesh: an assessment of universal health coverage.
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Apr 4;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0556-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study.
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e180-e192. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30486-2. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Economic burden of malaria on rural households in Gwanda district, Zimbabwe.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017 Aug 28;9(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1317.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验