Emotional intensity produces a linear relationship on conditioned learning but an inverted U-shaped effect on episodic memory.

Emotional intensity can produce both optimal and suboptimal effects on learning and memory. While emotional events tend to be better remembered, memory performance can follow an inverted U-shaped curve with increasing intensity. The strength of Pavlovian conditioning tends to increase linearly with the intensity of the aversive outcome, but leads to greater stimulus generalization. Here, we combined elements of episodic memory and Pavlovian conditioning into a single paradigm to investigate the effects of varying outcome intensities on conditioned fear responses and episodic memory. Participants encoded trial-unique images from two semantic categories as conditioned stimuli (CS and CS) before (preconditioning), during, and after (extinction) acquisition. We systematically varied the intensity of the unconditioned stimulus (US) during acquisition between-groups as a nonaversive tone, a low-intensity electrical shock, or a high-intensity electrical shock paired with a loud static noise. Results showed that conditioned skin conductance responses scaled linearly with US intensity during acquisition, with a high-intensity US leading to greater resistance to extinction and stronger 24 h fear recovery. However, 24 h recognition memory produced an inverted U-shaped relationship, with better recognition memory for CSs encoded before (retroactive), during, and following conditioning using a low-intensity US. These findings suggest a dissociation between optimal levels of emotional intensity on explicit and implicit learning and memory performance.