Suppr超能文献

与虚拟应用程序相比,使用自我管理应用程序和数字参与策略的有自杀意念的澳大利亚年轻人的依从性和疗效结果:一项三臂随机对照试验。

Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Torok Michelle, McGillivray Lauren, Gan Daniel Z Q, Han Jin, Hetrick Sarah, Wong Quincy J J

机构信息

University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.

Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 6;79:102963. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102963. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital interventions are important treatment solutions for suicidal ideation, but premature disengagement is a significant threat to their effectiveness. We tested the adherence to, and efficacy of, two versions of an app-based intervention (app only, app + engagement strategy) for suicidal ideation, compared to a sham app.

METHODS

This was an online double-blind, three-arm parallel randomised controlled trial in Australia. Recruitment occurred between May 30 and August 8, 2023 and eligible participants were aged 17-24 years and had suicidal ideation in the prior 30 days. They were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive (i) LifeBuoy-an app which delivered third wave cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) skills, (ii) the LifeBuoy app plus a digital engagement strategy, or (iii) a sham app to minimise expectancy bias. The primary efficacy outcome was change in suicidal ideation scores, measured by the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), at 30-, 60- and 120- days post-baseline. The primary engagement outcome was the number of app modules completed at 60-days post-baseline. The final assessment occurred on December 6, 2023. All data was analysed using intention-to-treat. This trial was registered at anzctr.org.au, trial number: ACTRN12621001247864.

FINDINGS

692 participants were assigned (mean age: 19.9 [SD 2.5]; 70% female; intervention (combined): n-459, control: n-233). Significant reductions in ideation scores were observed in the combined intervention condition at 60- (d 0.48) and 120- (d 0.29) days after random assignment compared to the control condition. There were no differences in the number of modules completed between the intervention conditions (OR 1.10, 1.03, respectively) and no significant differences in their ideation scores at any time (ds -0.15 to 0.08). Serious adverse events (hospital presenting non-suicidal self-harm and/or suicide attempts) were reported by 6% of participants during the trial (control condition: 9%; combined intervention condition: 4%). No deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

A third wave CBT app helped to reduce ideation severity, however providing additional online resources to promote therapeutic engagement did not enhance these effects.

FUNDING

This trial and MT was funded by the National Health & Medical Research Council, Matana Foundation for Young People, Alex Roth Foundation.

摘要

背景

数字干预是治疗自杀意念的重要解决方案,但过早退出对其有效性构成重大威胁。我们测试了两种基于应用程序的自杀意念干预版本(仅应用程序、应用程序 + 参与策略)的依从性和有效性,并与一个虚拟应用程序进行了比较。

方法

这是一项在澳大利亚进行的在线双盲、三臂平行随机对照试验。招募时间为2023年5月30日至8月8日,符合条件的参与者年龄在17 - 24岁之间,且在过去30天内有自杀意念。他们被随机分配为1:1:1接受(i)LifeBuoy - 一个提供第三波认知行为疗法(CBT)技能的应用程序,(ii)LifeBuoy应用程序加上数字参与策略,或(iii)一个虚拟应用程序以尽量减少期望偏差。主要疗效指标是在基线后30天、60天和120天通过自杀意念属性量表(SIDAS)测量的自杀意念得分变化。主要参与指标是在基线后60天完成的应用程序模块数量。最终评估于2023年12月6日进行。所有数据均采用意向性分析。该试验在anzctr.org.au注册,试验编号:ACTRN12621001247864。

结果

692名参与者被分配(平均年龄:19.9[标准差2.5];70%为女性;干预组(合并):n = 459,对照组:n = 233)。与对照组相比,在随机分配后的60天(d = 0.48)和120天(d = 0.29),合并干预组的意念得分显著降低。干预组之间完成的模块数量没有差异(分别为OR = 1.10,1.03),并且在任何时候他们的意念得分也没有显著差异(d值为 - 0.15至0.08)。在试验期间,6%的参与者报告了严重不良事件(因非自杀性自伤和/或自杀未遂住院)(对照组:9%;合并干预组:4%)。没有死亡报告。

解读

一个第三波CBT应用程序有助于降低意念严重程度,然而提供额外的在线资源以促进治疗参与并没有增强这些效果。

资金

本试验和MT由国家卫生与医学研究委员会、马塔纳青年基金会、亚历克斯·罗斯基金会资助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c34a/11665678/9de354ca1a73/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验