Hirsch Caroline, Kreuzberger Nina, Skoetz Nicole, Monsef Ina, Kluge Stefan, Spinner Christoph D, Malin Jakob J
Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50939 Cologne, Germany.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinstr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Mar 3;80(3):633-644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae482.
Persistent COVID-19 (pCOVID-19) in immunocompromised patients is characterized by unspecific symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates due to ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication. Treatment options remain unclear, leading to different approaches, including combination therapy and extended durations. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapies for pCOVID-19 in immunocompromised patients since the Omicron surge.
We searched MEDLINE and Scopus from 1 January 2022 to 6 August 2024 for cohort studies and case series on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, ensitrelvir and molnupiravir. Evidence certainty was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation for outcomes including viral clearance, recurrence/relapse, mortality, adverse events (AEs) and symptom resolution.
Thirteen studies involving 127 cases were included. Evidence certainty was very low. In combination therapy with at least two direct antiviral agents, viral clearance was 79%, with a 16% recurrence rate. All-cause mortality was 9%, and mortality was 6% while SARS-CoV-2 positive. In 47 cases, AEs were reported in 11%. Symptom resolution ranged from 3 to 6 days in two studies. In combination therapy with one direct antiviral agent and passive immunization, viral clearance was 89%, with an 11% recurrence rate and no deaths. In four documented cases, no AEs were observed. In monotherapy, viral clearance was 100%, with a 15% recurrence rate. One death, unrelated to SARS-CoV-2, occurred. In 12 documented cases, no AEs were observed.
Based on very low certainty evidence, combining one direct antiviral with passive immunization resulted in high rates of viral clearance and few recurrences. AEs occurred in cases treated with at least two direct antivirals. Controlled studies are needed.
免疫功能低下患者的持续性新冠病毒感染(pCOVID-19)的特征是由于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)持续复制而出现非特异性症状和肺部浸润。治疗方案仍不明确,导致了不同的治疗方法,包括联合治疗和延长疗程。本研究的目的是评估自奥密克戎毒株激增以来抗病毒疗法对免疫功能低下患者pCOVID-19的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了2022年1月1日至2024年8月6日期间MEDLINE和Scopus上关于奈玛特韦/利托那韦、瑞德西韦、恩赛特韦和莫努匹韦的队列研究和病例系列。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价系统对包括病毒清除、复发/再发、死亡率、不良事件(AE)和症状缓解等结局的证据确定性进行评级。
纳入了13项研究,共127例病例。证据确定性非常低。在至少两种直接抗病毒药物的联合治疗中,病毒清除率为79%,复发率为16%。全因死亡率为9%,SARS-CoV-2阳性时的死亡率为6%。在47例病例中,11%报告了不良事件。两项研究中症状缓解时间为3至6天。在一种直接抗病毒药物与被动免疫的联合治疗中,病毒清除率为89%,复发率为11%,无死亡病例。在4例有记录的病例中,未观察到不良事件。在单药治疗中,病毒清除率为100%,复发率为15%。发生了1例与SARS-CoV-2无关的死亡病例。在12例有记录的病例中,未观察到不良事件。
基于证据确定性非常低的情况,一种直接抗病毒药物与被动免疫联合使用可实现较高的病毒清除率且复发较少。在至少两种直接抗病毒药物治疗的病例中出现了不良事件。需要进行对照研究。