Suppr超能文献

临床督导员与健康相关专业学生之间的压力动态:一项范围综述方案

Stress dynamics between clinical supervisors and allied health students: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Wang Piao, Peebles Laurie, O'Connor Aine, Li Xinrong, Wang Yongsheng

机构信息

College of Nursing, Belmont University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Department of Music, Georgia College & State University, Milledgeville, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e094922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094922.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this scoping review is to connect theoretical research related to stress with practical applications to supervision experiences within allied health professions. Understanding the implications of stress between clinical supervisors and allied health students will allow for better insights to improve supervisory methods within clinical training, stronger mentorship and lead to better quality patient care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This review is conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, which includes defining the research question, developing inclusion criteria and searching for, selecting, extracting and analysing the evidence. A literature search will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), ERIC (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO) and Embase (Elsevier), as well as various grey literature resources. Studies will be included if they focus on undergraduate or graduate allied health students in a clinical setting and allied health clinical educators, and report on outcomes related to stress dynamics between these two populations. Results will pass through title/abstract and full-text screening before data are extracted using a tool developed by the reviewers. Data will be analysed and summarised descriptively and presented in both tabular and narrative formats.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and professional conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework on 2 October 2024 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/REK7Z).

摘要

引言

本综述的目的是将与压力相关的理论研究与应用于健康相关专业监督经验的实际情况联系起来。了解临床督导员与健康相关专业学生之间压力的影响,将有助于更好地洞察如何改进临床培训中的督导方法,加强指导并提高患者护理质量。

方法与分析

本综述按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的综述方法进行,包括界定研究问题、制定纳入标准以及检索、选择、提取和分析证据。将在MEDLINE(PubMed)、CINAHL(EBSCO)、ERIC(EBSCO)、PsycINFO(EBSCO)和Embase(爱思唯尔)以及各种灰色文献资源中进行文献检索。如果研究关注临床环境中的本科或研究生健康相关专业学生以及健康相关专业临床教育工作者,并报告这两个人群之间与压力动态相关的结果,则将其纳入。在使用评审人员开发的工具提取数据之前,结果将经过标题/摘要和全文筛选。数据将进行描述性分析和总结,并以表格和叙述形式呈现。

伦理与传播

本综述无需伦理批准。结果将在同行评审的出版物和专业会议上传播。

试验注册号

该方案于2024年10月2日在开放科学框架注册(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/REK7Z)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验