Da Silva Adrik Z, Mizels Joshua, Clinker Christopher E, Yoo Minkyoung, Nelson Richard, Joyce Christopher, Tashjian Robert Z, Chalmers Peter N
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Sep 14;5(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.011. eCollection 2025 Feb.
To perform an analysis of intraoperative costs associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) acellular dermal allograft patch augmentation and interposition.
This was a matched cohort retrospective cost identification analysis. We identified patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR with acellular dermal allograft patch augmentation or interposition between 2014 and 2023 at a single academic center. These were matched based on age and tear size to a cohort of patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR without a patch. Patients without preoperative MRI data were excluded. Via chart review, we collected demographics, medical comorbidities, tear characteristics, and intraoperative repair characteristics. Patch and control patients were compared with paired t tests. Differences in costs between patch and control patients were assessed using multivariable regression controlling for observable covariates.
One hundred and thirty-two (132) total patients were included: 66 patch patients and 66 control patients. The patch group demonstrated more tear retraction and utilized single row medial repair more frequently. Multivariable analysis revealed that there was a $4930 total direct cost increase with the utilization of a patch ( <.001) after controlling for age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), Charlson comorbidity index, gender, surgeon, tear width, number of anchors, occupation, biceps treatment, prior surgery, and repair construct. The multivariable analysis also revealed that a higher ASA was associated with a $1440 increase in cost ( =.012). Biceps tenotomy was associated with a $3303 decrease in cost compared to tenodesis ( =.001). Additionally, single row medial repair demonstrated a $1745 decrease in total direct cost when compared to a double row repair construct ( =.019).
The addition of a patch increases the total direct cost by $4930 when compared to arthroscopic RCR without a patch. Increased ASA, biceps tenodesis, and use of a double row repair construct were also associated with increased cost.
对关节镜下肩袖修复术(RCR)联合脱细胞真皮同种异体移植物补片增强和置入相关的术中成本进行分析。
这是一项匹配队列回顾性成本识别分析。我们确定了2014年至2023年在单一学术中心接受关节镜下RCR联合脱细胞真皮同种异体移植物补片增强或置入的患者。这些患者根据年龄和撕裂大小与一组接受关节镜下RCR但未使用补片的患者进行匹配。排除没有术前MRI数据的患者。通过病历审查,我们收集了人口统计学、医疗合并症、撕裂特征和术中修复特征。使用配对t检验比较补片组和对照组患者。使用控制可观察协变量的多变量回归评估补片组和对照组患者之间的成本差异。
共纳入132例患者:66例补片组患者和66例对照组患者。补片组表现出更多的撕裂回缩,并且更频繁地使用单排内侧修复。多变量分析显示,在控制年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、查尔森合并症指数、性别、外科医生、撕裂宽度、锚钉数量、职业、肱二头肌治疗、既往手术和修复结构后,使用补片会使总直接成本增加4930美元(P<.001)。多变量分析还显示,较高的ASA分级与成本增加1440美元相关(P=.012)。与肱二头肌固定术相比,肱二头肌切断术与成本降低3303美元相关(P=.001)。此外,与双排修复结构相比,单排内侧修复显示总直接成本降低1745美元(P=.019)。
与未使用补片的关节镜下RCR相比,添加补片会使总直接成本增加4930美元。ASA分级增加、肱二头肌固定术和使用双排修复结构也与成本增加相关。