Ren Yi, Li Lijing, Gao Jingchun, Hua Lei, Zheng Tiehua, Wang Fang, Zhang Jianmin
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, China.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025 Apr;39(4):1037-1048. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.043. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries. This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of regional analgesic interventions. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of regional block after cardiothoracic surgery. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption within 24 hours postoperatively, Pain scores, the time to first rescue analgesic, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were also collected. A Bayesian NMA was performed to compare the outcomes of interest. A total of 24 studies involving 1602 patients and 13 regional blocks were included. All techniques reduced opioid consumption within 24 hours postoperatively. The largest decrease was in the thoracic retrolaminar block group, with a WMD of -0.97 (95% CrI -1.1, -0.84) mg/kg morphine equivalent. In terms of pain scores, there was no significant difference between any block and the control at any time point except for the thoracic retrolaminar block group at 0 hours postoperatively. In addition, all regional blocks prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic, which was the longest in the pectoral nerve block group. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was the lowest in the epidural anesthesia group, followed by the transversus thoracis muscle plane block group. Regional anesthesia revealed significant opioid-sparing effects following pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. However, indirect comparisons are limited because of the heterogeneity of previous studies, and direct comparisons are needed to establish the relative efficacies of different blocks.
各种区域镇痛技术用于减轻接受心胸外科手术的儿科患者的术后疼痛。本研究旨在确定区域镇痛干预措施的相对疗效。检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库,以识别所有评估心胸外科手术后区域阻滞效果的随机对照研究。主要终点是术后24小时内的阿片类药物消耗量,还收集了疼痛评分、首次使用补救镇痛药的时间以及术后恶心和呕吐的发生率。进行了贝叶斯网络Meta分析以比较感兴趣的结局。总共纳入了24项涉及1602例患者和13种区域阻滞的研究。所有技术均降低了术后24小时内的阿片类药物消耗量。最大降幅出现在胸椎板后阻滞组,加权均数差为-0.97(95%可信区间-1.1,-0.84)mg/kg吗啡当量。在疼痛评分方面,除术后0小时的胸椎板后阻滞组外,任何阻滞与对照组在任何时间点均无显著差异。此外,所有区域阻滞均延长了首次使用补救镇痛药的时间,其中胸段神经阻滞组最长。术后恶心和呕吐的发生率在硬膜外麻醉组最低,其次是胸横肌平面阻滞组。区域麻醉在小儿心胸外科手术后显示出显著的阿片类药物节省效应。然而,由于既往研究的异质性,间接比较有限,需要进行直接比较以确定不同阻滞的相对疗效。