Lomi Francesco, Simonelli Ilaria, Cappa Stefano, Pasqualetti Patrizio, Rossi Simone
Siena Brain Investigation & Neuromodulation Lab (Si-BIN Lab), Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena - Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Biostatistics Service, Clinical Research Center, Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola Hospital, Via Di Ponte Quattro Capi, 39, Rome, Italy.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Feb 1. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09659-5.
Primary progressive aphasias (PPA) represent a group of neurodegenerative conditions affecting verbal communication abilities for which no effective medication is currently available. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NiBS) has been mainly explored as adjunctive therapy to conventional speech and language therapy (SLT) with promising results. The present meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate the efficacy of NiBS in PPA patients on a range of linguistic tasks (naming, phonemic fluency, semantic fluency). A literature search was carried out using EMBASE and PUBMED, searching for multi-session RCTs administering NiBS on PPA patients as stand-alone or with SLT. The results were not significant overall, indicating a null difference between the active and the sham condition on language functions; pooled effects tended to be higher in parallel than in crossover studies and for follow-ups than post-treatment. In the naming analyses, the combined effects for the studies that coupled NiBS with SLT were slightly higher than the overall effect at each time point, although not significant. These results need to be considered with caution given the low number of included studies and small sample sizes, but offer relevant indications for future research in terms of optimal treatment protocols and personalization of therapies.
原发性进行性失语症(PPA)是一组影响言语交流能力的神经退行性疾病,目前尚无有效的药物治疗方法。非侵入性脑刺激(NiBS)主要作为传统言语和语言治疗(SLT)的辅助治疗方法进行探索,取得了有前景的结果。本随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析旨在评估NiBS对PPA患者在一系列语言任务(命名、音素流畅性、语义流畅性)上的疗效。使用EMBASE和PUBMED进行文献检索,搜索对PPA患者单独或联合SLT进行多疗程NiBS治疗的RCT。总体结果不显著,表明在语言功能方面,主动治疗组和假治疗组之间没有差异;平行研究的合并效应往往高于交叉研究,随访时的合并效应高于治疗后。在命名分析中,将NiBS与SLT联合使用的研究在每个时间点的合并效应略高于总体效应,尽管不显著。鉴于纳入研究数量少且样本量小,这些结果需要谨慎考虑,但为未来在最佳治疗方案和治疗个性化方面的研究提供了相关指示。