Suppr超能文献

影响颌骨的牙源性感染全身抗菌治疗的最佳治疗时间:一项系统评价

Optimal treatment time with systemic antimicrobial therapy in odontogenic infections affecting the jaws: a systematic review.

作者信息

Ribeiro Eduardo Dias, de Santana Ilan Hudson Gomes, Viana Mayara Rebeca Martins, Fan Song, Mohamed Abdo, Dias Julliana Cariry Palhano, Forte Anderson Gomes, Pereira Júnior José Marcos, Ferreira Anderson Jara, Sant'Ana Eduardo

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Social Dentistry (DCOS), Health Sciences Center at the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.

Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05585-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to analyze the existing literature to determine the most effective and safe duration of antimicrobial treatment in odontogenic infections of the mandible, addressing a critical gap in clinical guidelines regarding optimal treatment duration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024551258), and a comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Google Scholar for articles published up to June 16, 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating different durations of antimicrobial treatment were prioritized.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 3,446 articles. After removing duplicates using Rayyan© software, 2,653 articles remained, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria. Following a thorough evaluation, 8 studies were deemed highly relevant and included in the final analysis. The findings suggest that shorter antibiotic regimens, typically ranging from 3 to 5 days, are effective when combined with surgical interventions, minimizing complications and bacterial resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates that the choice of antibiotic regimen and its duration should be tailored to the patient's clinical condition, the severity of the infection, and local bacterial resistance patterns. While amoxicillin and its derivatives are effective for most cases, alternative antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin or metronidazole may be more suitable in specific scenarios. These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment plans and the need for further randomized clinical trials to refine evidence-based guidelines.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在分析现有文献,以确定下颌牙源性感染中最有效和安全的抗菌治疗持续时间,填补临床指南中关于最佳治疗持续时间的关键空白。

材料与方法

在PROSPERO(CRD42024551258)上注册了一项系统评价方案,并在包括PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、ScienceDirect、Embase和谷歌学术在内的数据库中进行了全面检索,以查找截至2024年6月16日发表的文章。优先纳入评估不同抗菌治疗持续时间的随机临床试验(RCT)。

结果

数据库检索共获得3446篇文章。使用Rayyan©软件去除重复项后,剩余2653篇文章,其中26篇符合纳入标准。经过全面评估,8项研究被认为高度相关并纳入最终分析。研究结果表明,较短的抗生素治疗方案(通常为3至5天)与手术干预相结合时是有效的,可将并发症和细菌耐药性降至最低。

结论

证据表明,抗生素治疗方案的选择及其持续时间应根据患者的临床状况、感染严重程度和局部细菌耐药模式进行调整。虽然阿莫西林及其衍生物对大多数病例有效,但在特定情况下,环丙沙星或甲硝唑等替代抗生素可能更合适。这些发现凸显了个体化治疗方案的重要性,以及进一步开展随机临床试验以完善循证指南的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e479/11834263/fd7e156b9572/12903_2025_5585_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验