Salemme Simone, Lombardo Flavia Lucia, Lacorte Eleonora, Sciancalepore Francesco, Remoli Giulia, Bacigalupo Ilaria, Piscopo Paola, Zamboni Giovanna, Rossini Paolo Maria, Cappa Stefano Francesco, Perani Daniela, Spadin Patrizia, Tagliavini Fabrizio, Vanacore Nicola, Ancidoni Antonio
Department of Biomedical Metabolic and Neural Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy.
International School of Advanced Studies University of Camerino Camerino Italy.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025 Mar 12;17(1):e70074. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70074. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
Knowledge gaps remain about the prognosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Conversion rates to dementia vary widely, and reversion to normal cognition has gained attention. This review updates evidence on MCI conversion risk and probability of stability and reversion.
We searched databases for studies on MCI prognosis with ≥3 years of follow-up, established criteria for MCI and dementia, and performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to assess conversion risk, reversion, and stability probability. Meta-regressions identified sources of heterogeneity and guided subgroup analysis.
From 89 studies (mean follow-up: 5.2 years), conversion risk was 41.5% (38.3%-44.7%) in clinical and 27.0% (22.0%-32.0%) in population-based studies, with Alzheimer's dementia as the most common outcome. Stability rates were 49.3% (clinical) and 49.8% (population). Reversion was 8.7% (clinical) and 28.2% (population).
Our findings highlight higher conversion in clinical settings and 30% reversion in population studies, calling for sustainable care pathway development.
Prognosis for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) varies by setting; dementia risk is higher and the probability of reversion is lower in clinical-based studies.In both clinical and population settings, cognitive stability is ≈50%.A reorganization of health services could ensure sustainable care for individuals with MCI.Significant heterogeneity in MCI studies impacts data interpretation; follow-up length is crucial.Long-term prognosis studies on MCI in low- and middle-income countries are urgently needed.
关于轻度认知障碍(MCI)的预后仍存在知识空白。向痴呆症的转化率差异很大,认知恢复正常已受到关注。本综述更新了有关MCI转化风险以及稳定和恢复可能性的证据。
我们在数据库中搜索了随访时间≥3年的MCI预后研究,确定了MCI和痴呆症的标准,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以评估转化风险、恢复情况和稳定概率。荟萃回归确定了异质性来源并指导亚组分析。
在89项研究(平均随访时间:5.2年)中,临床研究中的转化风险为41.5%(38.3%-44.7%),基于人群的研究中为27.0%(22.0%-32.0%),最常见的结果是阿尔茨海默病性痴呆。稳定率在临床研究中为49.3%,在人群研究中为49.8%。恢复率在临床研究中为8.7%,在人群研究中为28.2%。
我们的研究结果突出了临床环境中较高的转化率以及人群研究中30%的恢复率,这就需要制定可持续的护理途径。
轻度认知障碍(MCI)的预后因环境而异;在基于临床的研究中,痴呆风险更高,恢复概率更低。在临床和人群环境中,认知稳定性均约为50%。卫生服务的重组可以确保为MCI患者提供可持续的护理。MCI研究中的显著异质性影响数据解释;随访时间至关重要。迫切需要对低收入和中等收入国家的MCI进行长期预后研究。