Nabulondera Agnes, Powers Madeline, Nabirye Rose Chalo, Akello Sarah Racheal, Turyasiima Munanura, Epuitai Joshua
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, P.O Box 1460, Mbale, Uganda.
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Muni University, P.O Box 725, Arua, Uganda.
Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 Mar 18;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00354-7.
The right to autonomy in family planning is a cornerstone of reproductive health. Yet, many women face challenges when seeking to discontinue provider-dependent contraceptive methods, such as implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). This study explored the experiences of women in Eastern Uganda regarding the discontinuation of implants/IUDs.
Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted 15 in-depth interviews with women and six key informant interviews with healthcare providers. The study obtained ethical clearance and used a thematic analysis.
Two themes were identified: (1) reasons for refusal and (2) women's reactions to refusal to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women were denied to discontinue IUDs/implants because the due date had not been reached, insertion cards were missing, and there were healthcare constraints, especially inadequate equipment. Early removal or discontinuation before the due date was considered as a waste of resources, unjustifiable, and it was seen to increase risk of pregnancy among young girls. Healthcare workers preferred to first counsel for side effects instead of heeding women's requests to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women often felt betrayed and powerless when they were denied to discontinue using IUDs/implants. They felt that their reproductive rights were undermined which fostered mistrust towards future use of provider-dependent contraceptives. Women reported physical, social, and mental health struggles including strained marital relationships following denial to discontinue IUDs/implants. Most of the women incurred costs in discontinuing the use of IUDs/implants in private facilities.
The findings underscore the need to uphold women's autonomy by improving access to removal services, and addressing systemic and provider-level barriers to discontinuation of IUDs/implants. Insertion cards should not be a mandatory requirement during discontinuation of contraceptives, while enhancing record-keeping systems can address the need for insertion cards. Respecting women's rights to discontinue contraceptives is essential for ensuring voluntary and sustained family planning use.
计划生育中的自主权利是生殖健康的基石。然而,许多女性在寻求停用依赖医疗服务提供者的避孕方法(如皮下埋植剂和宫内节育器)时面临挑战。本研究探讨了乌干达东部女性停用皮下埋植剂/宫内节育器的经历。
采用定性描述性设计,我们对女性进行了15次深入访谈,并对医疗服务提供者进行了6次关键 informant 访谈。该研究获得了伦理批准并采用了主题分析。
确定了两个主题:(1)拒绝的原因和(2)女性对拒绝停用宫内节育器/皮下埋植剂的反应。女性被拒绝停用宫内节育器/皮下埋植剂,原因包括未到到期日、插入卡丢失以及存在医疗限制,尤其是设备不足。在到期日前提前取出或停用被视为资源浪费、不合理,并且被认为会增加年轻女孩怀孕的风险。医护人员更倾向于首先就副作用进行咨询,而不是听从女性停用宫内节育器/皮下埋植剂的请求。当女性被拒绝停用宫内节育器/皮下埋植剂时,她们常常感到被背叛和无力。她们觉得自己的生殖权利受到了侵犯,这加剧了对未来使用依赖医疗服务提供者的避孕方法的不信任。女性报告了身体、社会和心理健康方面的困扰,包括在被拒绝停用宫内节育器/皮下埋植剂后婚姻关系紧张。大多数女性在私立机构停用宫内节育器/皮下埋植剂时产生了费用。
研究结果强调需要通过改善取出服务的可及性以及解决停用宫内节育器/皮下埋植剂的系统性和医疗服务提供者层面的障碍来维护女性的自主权。在停用避孕药具时,插入卡不应成为强制性要求,同时加强记录系统可以满足对插入卡的需求。尊重女性停用避孕药具的权利对于确保自愿和持续使用计划生育至关重要。