Jo Sooyeon, Fujita Akie, Osorno Tomás, Stewart Robert G, Vaelli Patric M, Bean Bruce P
Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Physiol. 2025 Jul 7;157(4). doi: 10.1085/jgp.202413719. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Nav1.8 sodium channels are expressed in pain-sensing neurons, and some Nav1.8 inhibitors significantly reduce pain in clinical trials. Several Nav1.8 inhibitors have an unusual state dependence whereby inhibition is relieved by depolarization. We compared the state-dependent action of several Nav1.8 channel inhibitors to test whether inhibition is relieved during action potential (AP) firing under physiological conditions to produce "reverse use dependence." A-887826 inhibition was substantially relieved by AP waveforms applied at 20 Hz at 37°C. In contrast, there was no relief during AP trains with suzetrigine (VX-548) or LTGO-33, even though inhibition could be effectively removed by long, strong depolarizations. These differences were explained by differences in the voltage dependence and kinetics with which the compounds dissociate from depolarized channels and rebind to resting state channels. Suzetrigine required the strongest depolarizations for relief (midpoint +33 mV) and relief was slow (tau >300 ms at +20 mV), so almost no relief occurred during an AP waveform. Relief from A-887826 required weaker depolarizations (midpoint +13 mV) and was much faster, so some relief occurred during each AP waveform and accumulated during 20-Hz trains. LTGO-33 required the weakest depolarizations for relief (midpoint -11 mV) and relief was even faster than for A-887826, but reinhibition between AP waveforms was far faster than for A-887826, so that relief did not accumulate during AP trains at 20 Hz. The results show that, unlike A-887826, there is no use-dependent relief of inhibition by suzetrigine or LTGO-33 with physiological voltage waveforms at physiological temperatures, but each for different reasons.
Nav1.8钠通道在痛觉神经元中表达,一些Nav1.8抑制剂在临床试验中能显著减轻疼痛。几种Nav1.8抑制剂具有不寻常的状态依赖性,即去极化可解除抑制作用。我们比较了几种Nav1.8通道抑制剂的状态依赖性作用,以测试在生理条件下动作电位(AP)发放期间抑制作用是否会解除,从而产生“反向使用依赖性”。在37℃下以20Hz施加的AP波形可显著解除A-887826的抑制作用。相比之下,即使通过长时间、强去极化可有效消除抑制作用,但在使用舒泽曲明(VX-548)或LTGO-33进行AP串刺激时,抑制作用并未解除。这些差异可通过化合物从去极化通道解离并重新结合到静息态通道的电压依赖性和动力学差异来解释。舒泽曲明需要最强的去极化才能解除抑制(中点为+33mV),且解除过程缓慢(在+20mV时τ>300ms),因此在AP波形期间几乎没有抑制作用的解除。A-887826的抑制作用解除需要较弱的去极化(中点为+13mV)且速度快得多,因此在每个AP波形期间都会有一些抑制作用的解除,并在20Hz的串刺激过程中累积。LTGO-33解除抑制作用所需的去极化最弱(中点为-11mV),且解除速度甚至比A-887826更快,但AP波形之间的再抑制比A-887826快得多,因此在20Hz的AP串刺激过程中抑制作用的解除不会累积。结果表明,与A-887826不同,在生理温度下,舒泽曲明或LTGO-33在生理电压波形下不会产生使用依赖性的抑制作用解除,但其原因各不相同。