Suppr超能文献

机械通气患者的替代者和医生在两个时间点的结果预测

Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

作者信息

Dufour Benjamin, Duehren Hannah M, England Ashley Eaton, Keuper Kevin, Quinn Thomas V, Shah Raj C, Diep Quyen M, Gerhart James, Greenberg Jared A

机构信息

Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL.

Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1235. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The decisions surrogates and physicians make for incapacitated critically ill patients depend in part on their expectations for patient recovery. We sought to determine whether the accuracy of surrogate and physician outcome predictions made during the ICU stay improves over time.

DESIGN

Survey study.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

SUBJECTS

Surrogates and physicians of 100 mechanically ventilated patients from March 2018 to April 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

At the end of the first week of mechanical ventilation and 1 week later, participants indicated on visual analog scales (0-100%) expectations that the patient would require mechanical ventilation in 1 month, require artificial nutrition in 1 month, be alive in 3 months, and be living at home in 3 months. Patient status was determined at 1 and 3 months.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were determined for each outcome, at each time point. Patients who died within the first month were considered to require mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition in the primary analysis. AUROCs for initial surrogate predictions were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72) for mechanical ventilation, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) for artificial nutrition, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.7) for survival, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.73) for living at home. AUROCs for initial physician predictions were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71) for mechanical ventilation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.0.83) for artificial nutrition, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) for survival, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for living at home. Average expectations among surrogates and physicians were highly stable over time; adjustments made to expectations did not result in more accurate predictions for the measured outcomes (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among surrogates and physicians of patients who were mechanically ventilated for 1 week, outcome predictions were better than would be expected by chance and not significantly improved 1 week later.

摘要

目的

代理人和医生为无行为能力的重症患者所做的决策部分取决于他们对患者康复的期望。我们试图确定在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间代理人和医生对患者预后的预测准确性是否会随着时间的推移而提高。

设计

调查研究。

地点

学术医疗中心。

研究对象

2018年3月至2019年4月期间100例接受机械通气患者的代理人和医生。

干预措施

在机械通气第一周结束时和1周后,参与者在视觉模拟量表(0 - 100%)上表明他们对患者在1个月后是否仍需要机械通气、1个月后是否需要人工营养、3个月后是否存活以及3个月后是否在家生活的期望。在1个月和3个月时确定患者的状态。

测量指标及主要结果

在每个时间点,针对每个结果确定受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。在初步分析中,将在第一个月内死亡的患者视为需要机械通气和人工营养。代理人初始预测的机械通气AUROC为0.61(95%CI,0.50 - 0.72),人工营养为0.67(95%CI,0.56 - 0.78),存活为0.66(95%CI,0.55 - 0.7),在家生活为0.61(95%CI,0.50 - 0.73)。医生初始预测的机械通气AUROC为0.60(95%CI,0.49 - 0.71),人工营养为0.72(95%CI,0.61 - 0.83),存活为0.69(95%CI,0.59 - 0.80),在家生活为0.76(95%CI,0.66 - 0.85)。随着时间的推移,代理人和医生的平均期望高度稳定;对期望所做的调整并未使测量结果的预测更准确(p>0.05)。

结论

在接受1周机械通气患者的代理人和医生中,预后预测比随机猜测要好,且1周后无显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7156/11949294/84d78b819e11/cc9-7-e1235-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验